Do you support the rise of kemono women?

Do you support the rise of kemono women?

Attached: 1647739385729.jpg (701x848, 313.63K)

Attached: 1645677127666.png (768x901, 537.47K)

Yiff in hell.

it´s ok when the nips do it

Yes

I support anything that has boobs

I think more of the difference lies in whether you are inclined to put on a fursuit or not.
most people here would be turned off by kigurumi despite it being Any Forums-related

Bottom is female, which is a pretty big difference.
"Cringe" is a verb too.

Fursuits scare me but I love anthro women (2D)

Attached: 066c416f450319afae4a409c7aa3d972.jpg (800x1148, 98.05K)

No.
Yiff in hell, furfags.

Inari-chan is pretty cute.

Kemono don't actually look like animals, they borrow some animal features but look 80% human
Western furry shit its 80% animal, 20% human and that's why it's disgusting and uncanny valley-esque

The difference is that one of them isn't autistic and a tranny.

I don't know, i'm konflicted.

>Kemono don't actually look like animals, they borrow some animal features but look 80% human
Not necessarily, kemono covers a wide range of things. Pokemon and Beastars for instance can both be considered kemono

Yes, as long as I can have wholesome impreg sex with them

Why are we still having this argument.

Attached: 1603577595071.png (403x321, 169.48K)

>kemono women
No, I find it disgusting and I don't support women I can't masturbate to

There is nothing wrong with this image. The top is some sparkledog that reminds me of a fucking cereal mascot and reeks of mental health gay, while the bottom is just a monmusu with more fur. They're nothing alike.

I just want to feel the fluff.

Attached: 1609098222771.jpg (900x994, 113.88K)

You guys like anime. You have no right to make fun of kemonos

Attached: Inukoro9.jpg (1920x1200, 1.26M)