We shall now begin ethics

Does Any Forums like it?

Attached: image.jpg (1979x1440, 692.8K)

The new 2nd gen is too zoomer for me, everyone has gender dysmorphia

Argumentation ethics is objectively right. Literally.

ethics are for retards

>durr it's like an actual class btw look at this quote by jackson, i'm so deep
no this read is really gay

I don't want ethnics nor philosophy in my manga. If I wanted that, I'd go read a book. This shit is just hamfisted

First gen > second gen

>I don't like ethics or philosophy
>better read this ethics manga
user, are you for real

I wish the slut would return as a teacher

It did when it was dumped here. Gets threads occasionally. Way better received than all out here though

Hell yeah. It really scratched my itch for something different and unique for a change. Every chapter makes me think. And the author's thoughts are really interesting too. I should pick it up again.

yeah I liked the first gen better too lol. Thought I was the only one.

I wish he just fucked her anyway. Manga is so predictable.

Too much femoid worship. To be expected since the author is female but it's still annoying. That creepy exhibitionist who was trying to frame them for sexual assault must've gotten her face pulverized, leaving it permanently deformed and been branded as a sex offender but was instead called "beautiful" by Chad.

It's one of those things where you actually can judge a book by its cover. It's as much pretentious pseud nonsense as the cover makes it look.

Pwease fuck me after school Teacher Chad uwu

>The first and most necessary topic in philosophy is that of the use of moral theorems, such as, "We ought not to lie;" the second is that of demonstrations, such as, "What is the origin of our obligation not to lie;" the third gives strength and articulation to the other two, such as, "What is the origin of this is a demonstration." For what is demonstration? What is consequence? What contradiction? What truth? What falsehood? The third topic, then, is necessary on the account of the second, and the second on the account of the first. But the most necessary, and that whereon we ought to rest, is the first. But we act just on the contrary. For we spend all our time on the third topic, and employ all our diligence about that, and entirely neglect the first. Therefore, at the same time that we lie, we are immediately prepared to show how it is demonstrated that lying is not right.

First Class > Second Class
also cute autism girl with plushy best girl

You cannot derive an ought from an is.

Attached: 800px-David_Hume.jpg (800x970, 114.63K)

It is okay, but a bit too episodic.

You talk like a fag and your shit's all retarded.

Attached: mpv-shot0002.jpg (1280x720, 109.51K)

The second class completely killed my interest.

fuck I lost the debate, fuuuuuuuuuckkkkk

Same happened to me. Might go back to it if it's still ongoing.