It wasn't that bad

It wasn't that bad

Attached: Ghost-in-the-Shell-SAC_2045-2.jpg (1500x2120, 323.94K)

YES IT WAS

POST IT

Attached: gits.webm (1920x1080, 2.92M)

It wasn't but no one's going to be able to see past the CG and crappy designs

I can't see past this

Is this a Disney movie

>defending netflix cgi trash
the absolute state of nu Any Forums underages

Netflix has nothing to do with anything outside of licensing

I said as much. I'm not blind, I understand where you're coming from - I just think there's still value in it.

You're the underage here. I bet you haven't even watched the first two seasons of SAC.

CGI nonsense art is entirely within line with GITS.

Please explain why GITS is supposed to look like shit.

Much of SAC (2002) and Arise looked like shit as well

Never read Man-Machine Interface?

Netflix needs a quality control department

>Much of SAC (2002) looked like shit as well
nuh uh

Compared to Arise it was almost a masterpiece. I still prefer mature Motoko design with sexbot body though.

Attached: GITS 16.jpg (1000x1169, 218.19K)

hahahaha the absolute state
this board is a joke now

The problem is that S.A.C. season one is simply too good. Add in the two Oshii arthouse movies and everything else just ends up in the trashcan.
Having minimal standards is sure rough.

Attached: 6.-GITS-SAC-2002-Poster-small.jpg (2845x4000, 2.19M)

Season 2 had some kino episodes too.

Attached: ghost-in-the-shell-sniper episode.jpg (1920x1080, 152.78K)

It was downright sacrilege.

Attached: interested.jpg (698x799, 51.28K)