Is it really that bad?

Attached: MV5BYzY3YjhiYTMtNDQ4OS00ZGI0LWE0ODQtOGM1N2M5OTQyNjk1XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjc2Nzg5OTQ@._V1_.jpg (500x789, 163.54K)

no, it's actually way better than super even if it treats the power levels like a retard

Better than SHITper.

Better than Super but in the words of the nerd, that's saying like the shit I took yesterday was better than the one I took today.
If they gave each planet a gimmick and made each planet an arc GT would have been great.

No, it's not. Pan is cute and so is Kid Goku!

At least it has 90s charm, the charm of cel animation, better writing than modern shonen writing, better directing than in most modern shonen anime. Therefore it's better than super.

Still generally crappy, but more redeeming factors and at least people never pretended GT was some sort of official continuation like they do with Super.

>people never pretended GT was some sort of official continuation

Attached: giphy (2).gif (195x229, 1.13M)

I only liked Gogeta

Attached: Gogeta Chortle.gif (360x270, 1.87M)

Not canon, don't care.

It's great ideas with shit execution, which is better than Super's shit ideas with mediocre execution.

Power levels were always retarded in dbz. Ironically DB treats them More maturely

Got tried something and failed pretty hard but super just gave us the same but worse…but still the same. I’ve actually fallen asleep attempting to rewatch gt

I unironically enjoyed it more than DBZ and Super.

I hate 'stuck as a kid' plots but in spite of that GT was really entertaining. Pacing was great. You kept on organically getting the next big threat out of each previous one without being interrupted by filler.

No

Pan is hot. That's the only good thing in GT.
Vegeta couldve gotten the DBalls in 7 episodes, but Goku and Co. like to act like retarded monkeys in every planet, and struggle against weak opponents.

It kinda gets better (Baby just got to Earth), but so far has been pretty stupid and boring (like most of Toriyamas manga, yeah I know its not based on manga or written by Toriyama)

GT tried. I think it gets points for that. Meanwhile Super just feels a like a half bake retread of Z. No risk at all.

LITERALLY Better than Z
People saying its better than Super are cowards. Man up.

Better than super

It tried, but it was more hit than miss.

I'll give it this though, SSJ4 was a way more inventive way to unlock a new powerup and had a much better design than Red Ki and Cyan Ki.

There are flaws, but it's not bad.
Previously it was called bad because the metric used was the good shit in DBZ.
But now we have another 'sequel' in Super, so since it's no longer the bottom of the totem, it is regarded more objectively. If you can even call Super a legitimate sequel instead of a soft reboot to sell merchandise.

There are a lot of things that can be criticized in GT, it does drop the ball early on, but it's core, that is, how it handles the characters, is done quite well.
They are consistent. For example, Vegeta. He maintains his development and conclusion of character arc. He's clearly still Vegeta, but a matured one that has come to peace with himself.
GT may be quirky, but it is clear that who made it respected the characters.

How Super handles characters is a disgrace in comparison.

I can confidently say its ending is better than Z.

GT is MAESTRO

Attached: 20220205_194505.jpg (600x341, 73.83K)