She's got a point, Deckardbros

Yeah this true but there's no hero/villain and no libtard revenge fantasy. Its a question of are these appliances human.

Replicants aren't robots

why do millenials root for soulless things like robots or dogs

what is this cynical approach to humanity

They have a built in life expectancy of five years because they tend to go on murdering rampages. Deckard is only doing his job, which is to scrap any that are wanted for crimes.

>why do millenials root for soulless things like robots or dogs
Relatability.

imagine being a zoomer too stupid to follow the plot of fucking BLADE RUNNER of all movies kek
so thankful my critical thinking skills weren't completely annihilated by staring at a phone 24/7

You misunderstood BR even more than she did.

>NOOOOO ONLY WE ARE ALLOWED TO CONSTRUCT GOLEMS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHH!!!!

they were soldiers who killed millions
the moustache guy spent 4 years loading nuclear artillery shells and firing them where Roy told him
A more problematic part of the film is when Deckard basically rapes Rebecca in the middle

Who the fuck says we should like Deckard? She doesn't get the concept of Cyberpunk, heroes and villains don't really exist there.
She might be better off watching Disney crap.

The replicants killed innocent people.

Rachel could've stopped him as easily as Zhora but she chose not to

>(((Schwartz)))

not as soulless as cats

They are absolutely no heroes. They are people (it's a point in the movie, regardless of what the retards here think) that have been wronged and did't react in an heroic or selfless manner.

They're taught for the first 18 years of their lives that they're guilty and need to be ashamed of themselves.

there's literally nothing wrong with a blade runner murdering their soulless sex slave

Attached: reeva steenkamp.jpg (474x762, 57.75K)

Came to post this

Because of Marvel films and Harry Potter, young people today see any movie as a battle between Good v.s. Evil. She obviously doesn't pick up on much nuance beyond that.
>"Like it's about four slaves who escape and come to earth as fugitives just for thee chance to stave off death"
Does she think movie audiences were less sophisticated than her in the early 80's?

>WAAAAH why isn't this protagonist 100% likeable
Has she failed to noticed that Deckafd is a little somewhat slightly conflicted about what he has to do? Has she failed to notice the film itself blatantly taking the replicant's plight seriously? How fucking dumb can you get? Is this woman not a professional writer of something? Is this satire? Am I being trolled?

/thread

Classic subversion attempt.

he also forces himself on another robot who he thought was a woman.

Attached: 1657764320039.jpg (500x334, 46K)

im surprised she didnt mention his casual rape of rachel

No, wrong. The antagonist force is the system. That`s one of the defining traits of cyberpunk. In this case the system is responsible for Deckard going after his fellow replicants as he does so completely in the dark. Only at the end he realizes the truth and is forced to flee.

>i don't get it
She does get it. That's the entire point of the film.

It’s morally complex yes, that’s what makes it kino.
One hand, yes, Deckhard should just leave them alone, they’re just trying to live. (But he’s tapping into the private dick trope of someone doing something grey because he needs to put food on his table, again, kino)
Other hand, machines are existential threats. Yes they may have souls, but motivations, progeny, food requirements, potential immortality - these things are rifts that could be unbridgeable.
And when something is unbridgeable, maybe not now, maybe not in a thousand years, but some time one or the other is going to die.
And machines after they figure out how to plug themselves in to a power grid they manage, their weaknesses are not on the same scale as ours.

There’s a reason why so many SF stories are warnings against fucking up uplifting machines.