Who did it better?
Who did it better?
The original obviously
one punch man, its strictly a parody eventhough some of the side plots have serious topics
the other ones are too far up their own ass while thinking they are really clever
>Japanese parody of Hollywood capeshit is better than Hollywood capeshit
How do they do it?
>boku no cuck
>better than anything
I might be biased, but bnha is really better than a lot of capeshit out there, and if compared with stuff like teen titans, that should be more or less the same age target, there is no comparision
I'm sure you have a well-reasoned argument for why BNH is bad. Would you mind sharing it?
fuck you for making this thread
Superman is lame, i don't understand why hollywood producers still try to make him work
Homelander is weak as shit compared to the others
>boring fights
>uninteresting use of powers
>MC and his stockholm syndrome boyfriend are completely unlikable and the rest of the cast doesn't get enough focus to make up for it
Literally none of those is good.
>world with 60% or so of mankind with powers is as stable as ours
I do not like RTX on Omni-Man
One Punch Man since he is the strongest of these characters. He is also not a giant pussy like superman or an edgelord like the other two
O
MY
SEVEN
QUIRKS
Saitama did nothing wrong.
The only one who isn't evil and an asshole, the only superhero: OPM
it is bad because i said so, nigger
Goku
Dragon Ball did the psychopath/apathetic superhero better
Saitama > J Jonah Jameson > Homelander > Geralt
>Shitku
One Punch Man, not even a contest.
American comics don't even sell 10% of what manga sell in the U.S.
Isn't one punch man basically just omni man without the psycho murder tendencies
Good fucking morning except for Shitren fags.