Why does hollywood refuse to cast attractive women anymore?

>CSA is a pseudoscience; psychological trauma is a myth:
ipce.info/library_2/rbt/skept.htm
>Children not harmed by sex:
newgon.net/wiki/Research:_Association_or_Causation
>Children enjoy sex and it was common historically and cross-culturally:
sexarchive.info/GESUND/ARCHIV/GUS/GUS_MAIN_INDEX.HTM
>Pedophiles aren't mentally deranged:
newgon.net/wiki/Research:_Psychopathy_and_abnormal_psychology
>Being against pedophilia makes no sense morally speaking:
sci-hub.se/10.2307/40441324
>Majority of child rapists not pedophiles
newgon.net/wiki/Research:_Offender_characteristics

Attached: adultadult2-1640228753.9802.jpg (1396x1633, 410.81K)

I feel ya bro I fell for her angelic beauty too, life is suffering

Damn little Aryan princesses

jealous roasties

Attached: 1467563637837.jpg (736x920, 81.73K)

>Russian
>Aryan
ISHYGDDT

limbal ring

it's not right brehs

Attached: 661262391659.webm (316x466, 2.51M)

FROM THE SICK AND TWISTED MIND OF JORDAN PEELE

>>CSA is a pseudoscience; psychological trauma is a myth:
>ipce.info/library_2/rbt/skept.htm
>>Children not harmed by sex:
>newgon.net/wiki/Research:_Association_or_Causation
>>Children enjoy sex and it was common historically and cross-culturally:
>sexarchive.info/GESUND/ARCHIV/GUS/GUS_MAIN_INDEX.HTM
>>Pedophiles aren't mentally deranged:
>newgon.net/wiki/Research:_Psychopathy_and_abnormal_psychology
>>Being against pedophilia makes no sense morally speaking:
>sci-hub.se/10.2307/40441324
>>Majority of child rapists not pedophiles
>newgon.net/wiki/Research:_Offender_characteristics
You know you can find a scientific journal that would support your beliefs no matter how illogical it is.

Also why are the citations from north america yes I did skim through it.

brehs ToT

Attached: skazka_alice~1662797583~2924080523170487860_3166909937.jpg (925x1157, 147.97K)

You can't find any articles published in a scientific journal with sound methodology that support the notion that there is an intrinsic link between harm and adult-child sex, because such a paper has never been published. You can't revise history to account for the ubiquity of adult-child sex in the past. You also can't make a moral argument against adult-child sex without adopting some form of sexual puritanism, otherwise the argument is inconsistent.
The idea that sex, something enjoyable and pleasurable, is somehow undesirable and traumatic when children are involved is absurd.

Attached: Innocence.jpg (920x379, 134.92K)

However, that being said, sex with you would definitely be traumatic and undesirable for people of all ages

those are children you pedo fuck

MODS!

>pro pedophile
Yes I agree that 13- and 14 year olds can have sex that's fun for them WITH EACH OTHER. The point is that children do experiment with each other and that's healthy but you equalize that with an 40 year old fucking an 10 year old lol.

>rules for thee but not for me
Lock them up and throw the keys away.

>an intrinsic link between harm and adult-child sex
That's how homos get started. How is becoming a homo with a prolapsed AIDS infested ass, not harmful? Are you throwing out all the data on gay "adult-child" sex?

>>rules for thee but not for me
>Lock them up and throw the keys away
Are you retarded? I'm not an 14 year old.

that's entirely the point. calm down, we're gonna call out illegeal intercourse by our pres.

Just because they can doesn't mean they should with each other, user. We're not talking about masturbation here. Chance is you already know that and you're just trolling

shes the reason

Attached: 2022-09-11_08h24_18.jpg (206x194, 9.18K)

she has her time and lost it.

poor brynn

I would kill everyone on Any Forums to marry them.