Jennifer Lawrence is every bit as good as DiCaprio. This is fucked

She's not and her name is nowhere near as big as his. Not anymore.

i wish we could have less shit threads and bait threads on tv. and i wish people would stop getting baited so easily into responding to them

Women can be famous millionaires with their elitest boot on your neck, and they will still call you oppressor. Same with niggers.
You can't win. until you destroy them.

how much did the rest of the cast make?

What a waste of a wish, fag.

OH MY SCIENCE
HOW WILLSHE AFFORD HER 5TH MANSION IN VENICE

Attached: 636481081249472493.jpg (1288x1683, 278.63K)

>be a woke retard
>make a stupid woke movie to own all the chuds
>hire a strong independent woke woman
>woke woman throws you under the bus and accuses you of being an evil sexist
Amazing

>Dicaprio - Oscar Winner
>Lawrence - Not Oscar Winner
its that simple

And that's a beautiful thing.

Not sure if trolling or stupid.

His character was much more interesting anyways.

Leo was the star of that movie. It needed his manic performance. Jlaws part could have been play by any one of dozens of actresses. In fact she was too old for the part.

After the Johnny Depp trial, you got an insight on how studios view your worth as a draw for the box office. I guess this is the Uno reverse card they play to counter it.

>>Lawrence - Not Oscar Winner

she did win an Oscar for silver linings playbook.

Jennifer Lawrence is an Oscar winner, four nomination in total.

Leo took 22 years and 5 noms to get a win. She got hers within 2 noms in a 2 year period and a career that was roughly 7 years old at that point. Nevermind who produced the movie she won for though.

lol it's almost like she only does one movie a year or every two years and her earning period diminished because she's on her 5th fucktoy each year.

Has she ever done a real nude scene?

yea, Leo has never done shitty comic book movies, J-law has been in like 4 of them. Which means, they're not going for her, they're going for the franchise.

let's see, on the one hand we have
>one of the most sought after and celebrated movie stars of his generation
and on the other we have
>blown out roastie who can't act and whose butthole has been seen by every man in the known universe
why is this surprising again?

I would never go out of my way to watch a jennifer lawrence film, just because she's in it.

I would go out of my way to watch a leo movie though.

Wouldn't a huge chunk of the movie going hoople heads see it the same way?

>worth less because of her vagina
nope, it's because I've already seen her butthole so I have no more interest in her

Attached: 1618022902061.png (1002x1800, 740.26K)

Women create life, quit underpaying them.

She did in Red Sparrow and she was more or less topless in Mother, but that was after her sex pics and tapes got leaked so she probably figured why not since it's out there and her people probably convinced her by doing nude shit she's "taking her body back"

Are there people actually animated by this and making noise for Lawrence's "right" to earn 5 million more dollary doos, on top of the millions she's already made from the movie, on top of the millions from other movies?

>Oscar == Academy award
my bad. Maybe i am a retard.

I though making a movie completely owning le hecking antiscience conservatards was rewarding enough?

Even if on the same level (they arent) Di Caprio is older and more experienced than Jroastie.

more women are dying childless than ever before in history. Females are obsolete.

and that is a good thing

Best scene was the ending (not because it was over.) It was the only joke that felt organic.

>literally who compares herself to the biggest movie star of our generation
Lmao.