what am I in for?
What am I in for?
comfy kino. it's better than the people here will tell you.
BIG
black
DINGUS
Anti-white cuckoldry from a shabbos goy.
Goggins kino.
Your typical Tarantino but longer
+ BLACK DINGUS
niggers, funny violence and "references" to other movies. In this one he copies The Thing, The great silence and Cut throats nine to name a few. Also it is a sort of classic mystery tale, with Samuel L Jackson making deductions and shit. I like it, it was entertaining
A long boring piece of shit with terrible cinematography. Skip it.
>analog film
>western
>big black dingus
>Kurt Russel
>SOVL
First half is pretty good. Last half is kinda shit.
>The racist sherrif is the good guy you fucking chud. You didnt even watch it, did you?
Still no 4k release, that shit was shot on 70mm dammit
Walton Goggins and Samuel L Jackson solving racism by hanging bitches together.
a great western with good characters, music and dialog
script got leaked from the internet so tarantio being autist that he is scrapped the original plotline then creating dogshit movie
would have been a very solid Tarantino installment without the big black dingus. honestly just drop Samuel L Jackson altogether, i'm tired of seeing him in Tarantino movies. yeah he was good in Pulp Fiction, move on already.
Not terrible, not great. Pretty much like every other Tarantino film post pulp fiction. There is an absolute asspull for the sake of the plot towards the end, and one of the worst narrations I’ve ever heard about halfway through. 7/10.
what was the original plot?
Tarantino's second best
Wasted potential. The premise is eight (actually nine) travellers taking refuge in an inn during a lethal blizzard and someone is a killer. Sounds like a kino premise where the killer will have to be smart, picking his moments to strike and being inventive to kill people in ways where he cant be identified, with each kill becoming harder and harder to pull off as the numbers are whittled down and everyone becomes more alert and paranoid.
10/10 setup but Tarantino is a one trick pony. Once the killer makes one move to kill someone the killer is IMMEDIATELY identified and the rest of the movie is Tarantino's usual schtick in which everyone is pointing guns at each other and talking for forty minutes until someone starts firing. This movie really exposed him as a hack, he's incapable of writing a scene of suspense that doesn't revolve around people aiming guns at each other for forty minutes until someone starts shooting. It's so telling he had such an excellent setup which asks for really clever creative writing (for the killer to be picking people off one by one in such a small enclosed location constantly surrounded by other people) but despite establishing that setup he immediately tossed it aside because he's incapable of writing anything other than people point guns at each other for forty minutes until someone starts shooting.
Fucking hack.
I can't believe how good this was at filtering people on here. The Major sure knew how to lie to serve his purpose.
Basically the same. Different order which made the gang under the floorboards more of a point of suspense and less of a surprise. Also the ending was diff I think. I read it but can’t remember. Pretty sure Sam Js character dies alone in the room as the snow blows in
Leaving in the scene where Kurt breaks the real antique guitar was a hack move. Jennifer completely broke character when it happened, to the point where I wondered what the fuck was up when I first saw it in the cinema without knowing anything about the guitar story. Tarantino thought it made her reaction more "genuine" but that doesn't work when she sounds like Jennifer Jason Leigh going "oh shit Kurt you did the scene wrong", instead of the character reacting to violence.
whats the story here? that scene looked pretty genuine to me, sad the guitar got wrecked though
they literally showed it, if they wanted to imply that he was lying then just show him telling the story.
sounds pretty based to me
nah, they showed scenes illustrating the story he was telling, but whether the story was true or not is left to the imagination
this user gets it