Who was in the wrong here?
Who was in the wrong here?
The restaurant. If you can't manage simple alterations to your menu like that then you're not cooking; you're just running a brain dead food assembly line and have no business being in business.
Restaurants don’t do this in real life
no substitutions, what's next, no choosing your order? I guess that is like a function room anyway, chicken or fish - swap if you don't like it.
id say the guy because patriarchy
Back then as a white (anglo-saxon) man you could get away with being a literal man child in public, throwing tantrums, chimping out constantly, behaving like a literal baby
That's why white male boomers are the most entitled pieces of shits on the planet nowadays
Just because the rules at a diner are stupid doesn't mean you have to sperg out in public
Why is everything about race when it comes to you people? Pathetic.
I have never in my life been to a diner that refuses to sell me a side of toast. This scene is inane.
I know, its so fake. Literally porn for karens and boomers.
This. He's not asking for something you don't have or for anything you don't have the means to make. Rulecucks who follow the letter of their rules rather than the spirit are the actual fucking worst.
It's based on something that happened to the director.
What do you mean, "you people"?
If the actor was black then you'd call the movie based for showing the nigger chimping out
Why are boomers like this?
And?
No it isn't. The director is an insane lying retard.
hot take: they're both in the wrong. the restaurant for not allowing substitutions and the boomer for acting like a baby against the waitress who doesn't even decide the menu fucks sake i hate boomers so fucking much
Because it is, unironically, different when a nigger does it.
post hand
>waitress doesn't decide the menu
But she does, that's literally how diners work
>ask the waitress for something not on the menu
>she writes down the order anyway and gives it to the chef
>the chef doesn't give a fuck and makes whatever is ordered
>your bill lists what you ordered and a reasonable price for it calculated from the price of the base meal plus whatever sides you asked for
That's how it works in every diner in the country. Are you some sort of eurofag or something? You've never been in a diner?
this
they're both being egotistical immature twats.
what actually happens:
>“ill see if the cook can accommodate you”
>cook berates waiting staff for even considering that he’d make accommodations for your shit he doesnt give a fuck about because hes under paid and over worked and if he does it anyway enjoy your food that has either been on the floor, spit on etc
see
never argue with people who are making your food. Why is this concept so foreign to amerifats holy shit.
If you're at a restaurant that has retarded rules, then just say "Nevermind then, thanks for your time" and leave.
captcha: GAYY2A
So you've never been in a diner before, got it. The chef doesn't give a shit about what combinations of foods are listed on the menu. If you ask him for any food that exists on the menu, he'll make it. The combinations of foods don't matter. Every diner will sell you each individual food by itself as a side order, and any of them together rung up as a combination of side orders. They don't give a fuck, go to a diner and see for yourself.
>argue
There is no arguing, you ask for something and they cheerfully give it to you. That's how diners work you stupid fucking euroscum.