Tangled (2010)

>Originally named "Rapunzel"
>Execs told them last-minute to rename it to "Tangled"
>"This will get the male audience."
Were they right, Any Forums?

Attached: tangled_ver4[1].jpg (535x746, 107.76K)

We want the pedo audience more like

they got the feet and bondage audience

Tangled is interesting because it was both the beginning and the end of the nu disney renaissance. It’s been 12 years and it hasn’t been topped

They would have got the male audience anyway. Everyone loves animated Disney.

Greatest waifu of all time.

Attached: baking2.webm (1742x1080, 430.68K)

>originally rendered with shoes on
>exec: can you take them off
>of course.sir every one of our models is anatomically correct, we can even strip her naked if you us to
>no thats quite alright, just shoes off... for now

imagine the shitstorm when some animator in one of those studios leaks the official model files and people immediately make porn with it
it's inevitably gonna happen someday and you know it. his life will be over from the legal shitstorm but it'll be worth it for the laughs and cooms

I liked it.

Attached: tangled.jpg (850x889, 236.47K)

sir, please, rapunzel is nice girl.

Tangled is a Kino name. They did good. Also best waifu and best dinsey movie, even if she didn’t have jasmine-tier cleavage.

when did disney ever care about their male audience?

Good one user. Now share the Zucchini picture. You know the one user.

Attached: 500386A5-27D0-481C-9BBB-6F7EEBA24AE3.jpg (400x400, 21.49K)

Well obviously, she's nice due to the regular spankings.

I only have this one.

Attached: tangled2.jpg (389x512, 63.13K)

Mother knows best.

Attached: Rapunzel bound and gagged.webm (1920x1080, 2.94M)

Oh yeah the renaming from "Rapunzel" to "Tangled" is surely what caused this and not what anons + said.
KINO
>Tangled is a Kino name.
Why though? It's a pretty complex word that most 8-10 year olds won't even understand. Yeah obviously, thematically if you see Flynn as the hero, he gets unintentionally "Tangled" up in this big story and conspiracy, and quite literally tangled up in Rapunzel's hair at some point. But objectively speaking, the story is ultimately about Rapunzel, which is a very catchy, unique and memorable name. It's a horrible titles, "Rapunzel" would've been objectively speaking a superior and more accurate title.
>when did disney ever care about their male audience?
Literally since day 1

Attached: 1658774917042973.webm (1920x1080, 2.82M)

>when did disney ever care about their male audience?
Treasure Planet was the last time Disney tried to appeal to a male audience, and it flopped.

nerd

Attached: 1661606966955333.webm (920x1080, 1.55M)

Tangled makes it seem like a dreamworks movie. Disney never hesitated to co opt the titles of other non licensed stories; Snow White, little Mermaid, beauty and the Beast, etc. The fact that it wasnt named Rapunzel and it was Disney's first 3d cartoon probably caused a lot of people to glance at the poster and assume it was some shrek spin off.

Yes, they werent thinking about their male audience at all when they made a feature length film starring an 18 year old blonde that doesnt wear shoes for a single frame. Retard nigger faggot cunt. I hate you.

Footfaggotry really isn't as common as you ponyfucking autists seem to think.

look up any fetish list and feet will always be near the top