The amount of actual retards who think this was the message of the movie astounds me

The amount of actual retards who think this was the message of the movie astounds me.
Reeves is the first director that truly loves Batman. The film isn't a condemnation of a Batman because "le white!" His lack of philanthropy as well as his prime reasoning for being a vigilante are imbedded into the theme of the fucking movie. Being gracious and inspiring is what Batman is! And Reeves spends three hours shitting on why "le morally grey" Batman is a bad idea.
EVERY SINGLE BATMAN DIRECTOR HAS HAD THEIR BATMAN KILL. BUT REEVES DOES NOT. SO FAR, HE IS THE ONLY ONE THAT TRULY CARES.
And CATWOMAN IS PROVEN WRONG regarding her "le white man!" speech. She is directly talking to a person she has condemned for being inactive in regard to Gotham's suffering.
You chuds hear a buzzword and go into rage mode. You don't even bother to fucking think.

Attached: Screenshot_20220906-111242.png (796x200, 66.91K)

You're a cuck faggot if you enjoy this anti-white trash. Kys.

You've been proven wrong and have resorted to slurs. Congrats. You've actively admitted your loss.

Cry about it, bitch.

Cope and seethe in peace, fren.

Sounds like you're doing enough for both of us.

I didn't like it because it was a stupid movie full of plot holes and they whisper like retards most of the time. Also it was too damn long and Pattinson looks like a highschool faggot.

>getting so triggered by my based post
lmao seethe

>Being gracious and inspiring is what Batman is!
No, that's Superman. Batman is all about striking fear into criminals. Sure, he wants the public to see him as a force of good, but he doesn't really care what Joe Schmo on the street thinks. The only people he wants to inspire are the police to stop being corrupt and do their fucking jobs.

Bad rebuttal. Therefore I win.

capeshit is for autistic virgins and esl niggers

Mean person :(

Seethe more, there's no Catwoman being proven wrong, that a sympathetic character even says that is explicitly anti-White, any introduction of racial themes into superhero media will be anti-White because it will be one sided. You're never going to hear Robin in The Batman 2 bring up 13/50 even if it's just so he can be """"""""proven wrong""""""" because Comissioner Gordon is a jigaboo. Kill yourself.

Holy based

Ego and Year One. He actively cares about what happens to "people on the street".
There are no plot holes. Whispering is noir, and Pattinson looked better than Bale and Affleck.

it was my post you fucking liar

Genuine retard who's surface level arguments already got BTFO'd in my original post.

uhm sir, that's ackshually my post
Sorry but it's true

1. It's whose*, moron.
2. Nothing in your OP addresses what I said.

>Ego and Year One. He actively cares about what happens to "people on the street".
First off, you're contradicting yourself. How can Batman be gracious if he has a huge ego? I agree that Batman has a huge ego. He thinks that he is Gotham's savior and he can never show weakness. Only he can do it and he can't accept help from anyone.The other thing is that he thinks that he's GOTHAM'S savior specifically. Not just the people of Gotham. And obviously yes, he cares about saving people. Otherwise he wouldn't be a hero. But that doesn't make him gracious or inspiring. The cop that pulled a guy out of a burning building isn't inspiring if he also takes bribes not to arrest the mafia that set the fire in the first place. In Batman's ideal world, there would be no Batman. In Superman's ideal world, everyone would be Superman. That's the difference between wanting to save a city and wanting to save the people.

Yes. Yes it does.
>It's only about anti-white!
No. She is proven wrong in the scene. When she says "Bruce and Thomas Wayne" it cuts to Batman and his eyes light up. That's called subtlety. She thinks the Wayne's are corrupt and don't help, but the person she's ranting to is a Wayne. If you can't see that, you have no right to criticize anything but the shits that come from your ass.
You can't be this dumb. You truly can't. There's no way.
BATMAN: EGO
That's the name of a comic you fucking tard.

In the progressive value system, racism is supposed to be wrong in *general*, not in *specific* cases. Batman doesn't talk about how general black dysfunction and criminality only to be "proven wrong" by the specific case of Gordon or Catwoman, because being critical of blacks is generally wrong within the progressive value system and he would no longer be a heroic character, whether he's "proven wrong" later or not. That a sympathetic character can say something anti-White is an expression of an anti-White value system underlying the film and its creators, regardless of specific dramatic irony in the scene. You are too dumb to understand.

>I am le...vengeance
>ctrl+F4