Chopper >>>Dr whats his face says "by studding these zombies I can learn how to bring humans back from the dead" >Chopper is all impressed by the idea (this is a good thing)
VS >>Chopper leans the plat girl was revived from the dead > *screams* > All these animals and people where brought back from the dead (and this is a bad thing)
Like WTF.
Zero consistency. Not that halloween shit made any sense whatsoever. >Nooo Dr Frankenstein is bad for reviving the dead ! >He simply is ! >Because because ! Because reasons !
This is why all of this halloween shit makes no sense whatsoever in any medium.
Can someone explain why >NOooo he/she is resurrected from the dead (and this is a bad thing) Makes any sense
Could someone translate for those of us who don’t speak retard?
Robert Bennett
Why is Frankenstein or reviving the dead considered bad?
Kevin Long
Maybe think about the consequences for 10 seconds.
Asher Hall
Watch Flesh of Frankenstein.
Jaxson Perez
I did. Did you?
>Religion is obsessed with the resurrection of the dead (and this is a good thing). >internet rando: Did you think about the consequences (and this is a bad thing)
Christian Collins
>Flesh of Frankenstein. IMDB link and torrent link plz.
>imdb.com/title/tt0071508/ Thanks. The name however is Flesh for Frankenstein Not Flesh of Frankenstein
I was not sure what movie that is.
>Just search it on qbittorrent. You know you can send me over the magnet link from your search.
Evan Hughes
No idea what this will show me. The zombies are fucked up in some way.... So. More experimentation is needed.
Also I love how Frankenstein is literally stuck in that 1901 timeline.
>Nooo I can not stop my creation REEE Meanwhile anyone worth their money in 2022. >My creation is opposing me? >SYSTEM COMMAND: initiate shutdown; authentication code Gama. Wow that was fast.
If you are wondering how. Simply take a taser and saw it into the creature and wire up a remote control. Press the button and it gets shocked.
I have no idea what you're talking about, but I gotta give you props for the Chopper love. Zoomers dismiss his character because they only care about strength and fighting, but he is a funny, caring and essential member of the Straw Hat crew. Power scalers can go fuck themselves
Brandon Roberts
>I have no idea what you're talking about I'm asking what is bad about reviving the dead like in Frankenstein.
The TV version of Frankenstein basically requires you accept shit loads of assumptions that really do not make sense for why what Dr. Frankenstein is doing is bad.
The book version of Frankenstein is simply total nonsense and characters (including Dr. F) threatening to lock down over histrionics.
Christopher Richardson
>Zoomers dismiss his character because they only care about strength and fighting Based, they carry on the power scaling tradition of DBZ.
Anthony King
The novel is from 1818. By then medicine was plainly wrong and yielding terrible results. >no germ theory >opium as medicine >lackluster understanding of physiology
Because the records of divine cure show good results with no drawback. >Jesus: "You're healed! No side effects! And, free of charge, your sins are forgiven!"
Liam Wood
Most coherent One Piece spic
Jaxon Perez
>show good results with no drawback. Source? >Because the records So what is bad about reviving the dead? Literally everyone pretends like it is the worst thing ever in all Frankenstein media.
>The novel is from 1818 And I was talking about movie Frankenstein not book Frankenstein.
Jose Stewart
Dumb esl poster
Asher Reyes
THE BIBLE! >It's not real Maybe, fedora-tipper! But did people in the 18th and 19th century believe that? No!
>So what is bad about reviving the dead? We don't know. And that's the point. Something awful could happen. Medicine was making questionable calls at the time and people died because of that or got some weird side effect. It's a horror story, so of course the result's going to be bad.
>And I was talking about movie Frankenstein not book Frankenstein. You mean the adaption from the book? It's not an original IP, so it's supposed to adhere, even if marginally to the themes and plot of the book or you'd get shit like rangz of girl powah
Ayden Hall
Why Frankenstein makes no sense whatsoever: >It basically requires a world where religion never existed and no one tried resurrecting the dead OR >Religion exists only humans think it is sacrilegious for humans to resurrect the dead Pick your poison at this point.
Also there is lots of babbling >Upsetting the natural order Yet if god does it it is OK ???? See above. And basically other nonsense vocalizations of disapproval.
Also the opposition to Frankenstein requires you accept a very specific view on corpses. >REEEE taking the bodies of the dead is wrong !
The entire thing is nonsense.
Elijah Hernandez
>THE BIBLE! I'm sure you can quote me that part then. I wait.
OH LOOK IT IS NOT IN THERE!
Also >THE BIBLE! Bzz. Yet the wounds of jesus did not heal, this means that at least in jesuses case (others are literally unknowns) his body was not repaired.
> fedora-tipper! Why would I have a christian hat on me?
> fedora-tipper! No you can bring in the bible like any other work of fiction. Only I'm telling you that the bible does not confirm the restoration of these resurrected people. And jesus did not get his wounds magicked back up.
>You mean the adaption from the book? Are you for real? The point is that all the lightning and other shit in the monster creation where created in the movies and are not in the book.
