They literally canceled an entire movie. It was completely shot and edited and everything. And they just destroyed it.
They literally canceled an entire movie. It was completely shot and edited and everything. And they just destroyed it
You wouldn't have watched it anyway
imagine how bad a fucking movie must be that, even completed and finished in post production, the studio deems it better to dumpster it than to just release it even to streaming
There are two facts that I know about.
The first. Guy Ritchie is working for Disney (more specifically on Hercules now). The film could have raised an unpleasant wave of negativity towards Ritchie (from racism and this shaft would then be very hard to stop, all of Ritchie's work would have been shredded and all the facts would have been brought up, and Ritchie, well, he is not a "white nice man") which would have affected Disney as well.
Second. The Russians partially financed the movie.
oh damn this looked ok for a guy ritchie
What? Why? Even Wrath of Men was good. Yes, it's not a masterpiece, but at least it was fun to watch and it was a waaaay better than some capeshit.
>imagine how bad a fucking movie
It wasn't. Something different happened.
explain
The whole movie was about evil Ukrainians
Read it. It's not some mystery out there. But there are many other factors.
Not about "evil Ukrainians," just about the Ukrainian mafia. Yes, that too, but I think they're also afraid that everyone will find out that the movie was financed by the Russians.
>no no no every Ukrainian is a perfect Angel incapable of doing anything bad!!!!!!!!
What a cowardly faggot move.
I will never watch this movie, even if it does ever come out
>125 million for some bland movie starring Statham
And yet the guy cant get 30 mill for Rocknrolla sequel
Statham sells that's why. I don't understand it myself but people love the bald cunt. That chink shark movie was a huge hit for example.
> Budget
> $130,000,000
Pleb producers. I'd love to see a cool Ukrainian gangster if they added a minor touch here and there
t.ukranian
There's a sequel to Tropic Thunder with Jamie Fox & RDJ that got made, isn't there? Filmed, etc. but can't be released due ot the climate
So after he made probably the worst live action Disney remake, which iis btw a true staple of achievement, they decided to give him another one of their movies
They did the same with 'Batgirl'. I was stoked for that one.
>So after he made probably the worst live action Disney remake
user...
>I don't understand it myself but people love the bald cunt.
Russians and Indians love him. The main box office of these movies is third world countries.
good
>Aubrey Plaza as the seductive women
>Josh Hartnett as Josh Hartnett
>Le black man rubbing hand thing
Ritchie sure makes strange films these days
So what? Now they're going to make everyone Moldovan?
Fuck, I really wanted Guy Ritchie kino...
Look how bad it looks, especially for Disney. The movie was partly financed by the Russians. It shows Ukrainians in a bad light. The movie was supposed to be released just after the Russians attacked the Ukrainians. Many Ukrainians fled from Russian missiles and became refugees. And here is a film like this. Disney pulled some strings. Guy Ritchie is like a watering hole and working on Hercules.
It's a shame production studios care about 'bad looks' and media reaction.