Practical effects are always bet

>practical effects are always bet

Attached: tumblr_pytluuQvJz1s01qkyo2_500.gif (500x383, 745.41K)

ter

Bad practical effects make me admire the effort while bad CG only makes me more antisemitic.

Sheeeesh them stop-motion is bet, no cap fr fr

I hope you stop motion sometime soon

Attached: harry-potter-and-the-sorcerers-stone-bad-cgi-troll.jpg (618x325, 16.03K)

This should be a Any Forums banner

SOVL

you aren't wrong

Attached: itstrue.png (408x489, 344.01K)

No cap

Attached: worst-cgi-main.jpg.optimal.jpg (640x430, 22.25K)

Based

Attached: 1652808984187.png (723x800, 467.23K)

Even bad practical effects have SOVL

Marshit

Attached: Internet-Blasts-Poor-CGI-of-Recent-Marvel-Flicks-After-Former-VFX-Artist-Reveals-Inhuman-Working-Conditions.jpg (1280x720, 65.99K)

the practical effects purists are a special kind of retard

Attached: uaJzvDoRByY2yZBpcFk5S6-1200-80.jpg (600x300, 26.45K)

This

this just perfectly summed it up desu

They are

making cgi takes a lot of effort user, even if it looks like shit, cgi is not pressing one botton and the computer does it for you, a lot of talented artists are involved and hundred of hours of work, is not much different than practical effects

buffy's effects were mostly based

Attached: 1655230807763.webm (720x900, 2.28M)

Old age makeup is actually shit but so is digital aging. Just needs to be different actors

qrd?

CGI is always the cheaper and easier default for studios, always

Comforting a kid who's father died