>17 year old CGI thats still mogging modern ones
How did they do it?
17 year old CGI thats still mogging modern ones
Bentley Fisher
Robert Foster
Talented and skillful artists with trained eyes who actually cared
Dylan Smith
They outsource it to pajeets.
Adam Harris
this
Carson Hill
Yeah they dobt give a fuck anymore cuz goycattle will eat it up either way
Kevin Lopez
FPBP. Disney absolutely cannot do this post 2012
Andrew Wood
>2022
>literally 42 years since 2000
I thought special fx would be photorealistic by now. So why is quality stagnating or dropping?
I liked Valerian, though. Avatar was also good. So
Blake Bailey
>CGI in 2022
Jaxon Murphy
technology is no longer the limiting factor, now its artistry
Jackson Williams
>technology is no longer the limiting factor, now its artistry
you really believe this? lmao
we are not advancing
Adam Barnes
The magic of Pentium III and Nvidia MX 440 era
Nicholas Reed
he isnt wrong you dumb zoomer
Andrew Collins
>full retard zoomer take
>call me a zoomer
wow
ok enjoy your "advancement" while civilization regresses to monke because white people just can't admit that niggers aren't just crispy white people
Ryder Hall
plus the fact that these companies aren't producing this kind of content anymore... "badly done" or not
it's really just random speculation
diversity hires aren't enough, it's literal technological stagnation
you think only artist jobs get niggerfied? no, stem fields are too
anyway take your meds schizo millennial faggot
Ryder Scott
It was before shitty unions went crazy and started overvaluing that shitty labor. Now Disney outsources to Canada and pajeetastan
Luis Bennett
You ever heard of the idiom "casting pearls before swine"?
Tyler Brooks
more like the poofta award innit
Xavier Allen
user, they used a real octopus on his face. they just said it was CGI in order to avoid getting sued by animal abuse activists.
Nathaniel Sullivan
Serious question: is this really the CGI‘s fault, or a retarded ass script coming up with a stupid visual that’s then framed and lit in unfitting ways? Feels like there was no way to visualize this scene non-stupidly
Adrian Thomas
it wasn't outsourced to India or a cheap korean animator
Kevin Cook
Why worry about matching the lighting or giving any CGI characters physical presence when the average audience member is far too fucking stupid to notice or care?
Ryder Sanchez
Literally what
Juan Sanchez
Because its "wet".
Oliver Hall
Both.
Nobody fucking cares anymore, really. Writers and directors are all nepotism plugs and the cgi teams are just factory farms of indians with post-it notes as references working for a bowl of rice.
Consoomers will eat anything up, no matter how bad because the whole 'hype culture' media industry is on disney payroll and keeps shilling for it. And even if they don't, it was never about making a profit anyway.
Carson Nelson
Why can't it be both? The script is definitely nonsense, but this scene in particular is bad, and not exclusively because of the floating head. Feels like a low budget reshoot to fix a gap in the script that ended up creating six more.
Jace Ortiz
user, niggers aren't technology. When another user says "technology isn't the limiting factor" and you say "niggers aren't white people", how does your brain make those opposites?
Asher Scott
The best major use of CGI in recent years has surprisingly been Kong Skull Island & the subsequent Godzilla films. Really solid light and color matching between the CGI and physical assets/actors.
Luke Mitchell
Sirs, with respect, my point is simply that technology isn't advancing, and the falling quality of modern CGI is an example of that. The cracks are finally starting to show, even in normalfag capeshit land.