What evidence do they have against Saul again?

What evidence do they have against Saul again?
Hey just say they have enough evidence to pin him in a bunch of crimes, including involvment in the murder of Hank and Steve. But what evidence? Who's testifying against him?
I assume Skylar's testimony + paperwork would maybe be enough to pin money laudering and conspiracy on him. But what else? And would that really be "life sentence" material?
Someone with knowledge of US law coud please clarify how would the DA be able to prossecute him for so much shit that, as far as i remember Breaking Bad, cannot be traced back to him?

Attached: images - 2022-08-17T103424.022.jpg (678x452, 27.25K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=_In2SR4_k2E
twitter.com/AnonBabble

The series already ended man
Let it go. Move on.

Keep it to one thread shit stain

Saul literally laundered his money through a loan-out called "Ice Station Zebra Fish & Assosciates". Do you really get the sense that he was such a mastermind he covered all his tracks?

they have nothing on him and everyone else was dead or missing

youtube.com/watch?v=_In2SR4_k2E

He is guilty of being white. That's all that matters.

Western media is garbage, the stories suck, the writing is terrible, and every show made between 1980 and 2030 is about how much white people are evil, and women are better.

If Saul was a white woman, a black lawyer would blame Trump, and the she and the lawyer would have sex as the show ends, BBC.

WE get it Hollywood, the Jews who run you hate white people and want to see white women have sex with a black man in every show, commercial and advertisement.

Oy vey Goyim! Genocide all white men, suck black dick every day or else you are a terrorist!

Huell spitted all out to Hank, they could easily find him back.
Hank had copies of Jesse's full confession in his home, not to mention all his notes.
charging him for Hank's and Gomez' murders seems harder though. that's probably one of the first thing they dropped during the bargain.

Jesus Christ, your mind has been UTTERLY buck broken by pol

He's not charged for murder. His charges are all about criminal conspiracy and money laundering.

Seek help. Go for a walk outside and listen to the breeze in the trees.

>unironically posting The Critical Drinker
You're barely a human being

How the fuck was Saul an accessory to murder of Hank and Gomey? He didn't help cover it up, he had nothing to do with the actual killing, pretty sure he didn't even know about it before Walt died, and unless he saw it on the news its possible he wouldn't know about it at all.

Attached: 1659791818245816.jpg (250x142, 4.11K)

He wasn't

Trump lost

Did you write the GOODGOY TAX post that got a shitton of (You)s?

Fransesca, Huell and Skyler all likely cut deals with DEA to save themselves.

We know from the phone call that feds got far enough to catch Saul's offshore accounts. It's over

why are you losers posting on Any Forums?

They are throwing RICO at Saul, so he can be charged as a co-conspirator for all the crimes Walter committed.

Any Forums has been shilling that terrible channel hard for the past few weeks. I don't get it. It's a terrible channel.

RICO is unconstitutional

it's a RICO case. His involvement with some of White's crimes essentially makes him culpable for all of White's crimes.

Plus, the feds already found all his shell companies and seized them, which he was using to launder money for White/Pinkman, so he's directly connected to them with a paper trail. He also acted as their lawyer in several cases, also committing a bunch of crimes while doing that etc

fpbp

>They are throwing RICO at Saul, so he can be charged as a co-conspirator for all the crimes Walter committed.
Okay. That makes sense.
IiRC Walt called Skyler's bugged phone and "confessed" for Hank's muder. Still kind of weird that you can pin that on Saul somehow.

Its called a criminal conspiracy. It's how they get mob bosses even if the boss didn't commit any of the crimes himself he's still responsible for every single one.

>charged with accessory after the fact for the fed murders
>An accessory-after-the-fact is someone who assists 1) someone who has committed a crime, 2) after the person has committed the crime, 3) with knowledge that the person committed the crime, and 4) with the intent to help the person avoid arrest or punishment.

That's like the exact definition of an attorney. How can they charge him on this?

Attached: 1652934073361.png (741x568, 29.42K)