What should we know about this documentary?

what should we know about this documentary?

Attached: CA5CFBB6-4403-4A7B-95F9-5307518BAEB7.jpg (331x499, 40.07K)

Matt "jews are our friends " Walsh
He complains about feminism and then supports its biggest producers

You CHUDS are STILL spreading toxic dangerous transphobic misinformation? That's it, no more Mr. Nice Guy -- ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

MAYONNAISE CHUD, your toxic rhetoric will NOT divide us.

Mayonnaise CHUD, we do not forget. We do not forgive. You have been warned.

We are the Chudbusters. Mayonnaise Chud of Chuddonnaise, consider yourself WARNED. This is ChudWATCH.

Chudbuster OUT.

they play both sides for maximum shekels
>create something that will ruin society
>make money complaining about same thing

>what is a woman?
A person who identifies as a woman.
>what is a man?
A person who identifies as a man.
Why can't this chud understand?

A person who identifies as a what?

That some of the interactions are funny, but ultimately is very shallow as a documentary.

>I didnt do my English homework

Ragebait for the type of people who watch Ben Shapiro

Basically this, there's no point in trying to get to the bottom of something with people whose ideology revolves around never arguing in good faith

I haven't seen it and have no interest in doing so, but I'm glad its annoying certain people.

>identify as something undefinable

Why am I not surprised that a chuddie is illiterate?
Man/woman is how we specify gender and pronouns to use in daily conversations

SHOULD we? No. It’s of low integrity and no artistic merit. The reason we do is Ben Shappy and the Kochs

Using the same word to define a word means you dont know what the word is, like
its what kids say when they didnt do their homework and dont know
>what is a shovel?
>Its anything that looks like a shovel!

this. he's basically a less funnier version of Ross McElwee

Attached: Brightl.jpg (380x260, 115.87K)

>makes trannies seethe because they can't answer one simple question
>makes TERFs seethe because it's a man who's breaking trannies instead of them

/ourdocumentary/, no doubt.

You guys might think it's funny because it "owns the libs" but keep giving christian radicals attention and influence and see what happens.

>christian radicals
all 5 of them?

I liked it but I think it wasted the underlying issue that was implied by his wife when she gives him a definition. Sociological gender-studies terms are useless in practical application and in policy guidance because they obscure reality.

Like that meme on tiktok where a 5th grader had some existential crisis because one of her students identified as banana-rock, she had a meltdown because she didn’t know if he was making fun of her (he was), and she felt like she now had to call him that. These terms become so broad and all inclusive that they become functionally useless at actually identifying anything.

If it doesn’t help people come to verisimilitude of reality, it is useless in practice, and only functions in a classroom as a thought exercise.

*Sorry, a 5th grade teacher, not a 5th grader, the teacher had a meltdown.