IT’S UP

kino

Why does it open with the instrumental orchestral version of Unchained Melody from Ghost?

Attached: 1645846799560.jpg (258x245, 12.45K)

>oy vey do some research goyim
>N-NO DON'T USE THOSE SOURCES, ONLY THESE APPROVED SOURCES!!!

>do some research
>stop pretending breitbart citations are research btw

>leftist propagandeur immediately namedrops LE VERBOTED site names
>"t-that's where you get all your info from, chud!!"
Oh no no, why are you revealing how scared you are so soon?

>leftypol doesn't even know how to greentext right

Attached: 1646722212934.jpg (255x219, 12.27K)

this is only funny as a joke

This movie shouldn't be on YouTube

HOLY SHIT! MY CAPTCHA!

Attached: oyvay.jpg (383x361, 54.14K)

national socialists are just retarded communists

they're dumber

sure, still, shouldnt be censored. Straissand effect and all that

>be member of the future master race
>complain how the jews run everything
>get blown the fuck out by literal subhumans

KWAB

>finally the based truth!

Attached: 1593644149979.jpg (1024x778, 113.58K)

I'm jewish ads me anything

Thanks. Just reported this to youtube.

How can you manage being so BASED and so REDPILLED?

It's a pretty primitive piece of neo-Nazi propaganda.

Some of the things have been responded to here:

np.reddit.com/r/ShitWehraboosSay/comments/3kprm0/the_greatest_story_never_told_for_good_reason/

I wrote a response to the Holocaust denial part, which I'm repeating in this reply, here: holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2018/04/debunking-youtube-denial.html#tgsnt

Obviously, if the mockumentary gets everything about the Holocaust hilariously wrong, the whole is useless.

I will simply list direct responses to the "points" the video makes.

Contrary to its claum, the Nuremberg Danzig soap has never been debunked. It was not mass-produced but some human soap was indeed made. It was obviously not the "Jewish soap", which is a myth. This claim is fully treated here: holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/11/nazi-shrunken-heads-human-skin.html#humansoap

The shrunken heads are supported by documentary evidence, as elucidated here: holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/11/nazi-shrunken-heads-human-skin.html#shrunkenheads

So are the tattoos, which were gathered from corpses for research on criminality, as explained here: holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/11/nazi-shrunken-heads-human-skin.html#tattoos

Attached: 1650084236002.jpg (385x512, 36.48K)

The existence of the extermination decision-in-principle is documented in Goebbels' diary entry describing Hitler's speech in a small circle of high-ranking officials on 12.12.41:

"Regarding the Jewish question, the Führer is determined to clear the table. He warned the Jews that if they were to cause another world war, it would lead to their own destruction. Those were not empty words. Now the world war has come. The destruction of the Jews must be its necessary consequence. We cannot be sentimental about it. It is not for us to feel sympathy for the Jews. We should have sympathy rather with our own German people. If the German people have to sacrifice 160,000 victims in yet another campaign in the east, then those responsible for this bloody conflict will have to pay for it with their lives."

See here for more documents on the extermination intent: holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/06/debunking-david-coles-auschwitz-video.html#docs

The author then raises a strawman as well as a false dichotomy. First he implies that the only evidence that should count is autopsy reports, photos or footage.

He then "forgets" about the documentary evidence e.g.:

Contemporary german documents on homicidal gas vans: holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2015/10/contemporary-german-documents-on.html

Auschwitz construction documents proving gas chambers: holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2015/05/rebuttal-of-mattogno-on-auschwitz-part_3.html

Then he implies that the only gassing witnesses that count testified at Nuremberg (and yes, Nuremberg witnesses could be cross-examined).

The fact is that there were many dozens of trials having to do specifically with gassings, and hundreds about the Holocaust in general (which is not reducible to gassings). Of them many took place in West Germany, so the "Soviets" part was just another strawman.

The "Auschwitz had lots of non-extermination stuff" idiocy is debunked here: holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/05/rebutting-twitter-denial-most-popular.html#auschwitzswimmingpool

Also see this: holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/05/rebutting-twitter-denial-most-popular.html#unfit

David Cole now admits (countercontempt.com/archives/5348) that Nazis gassed and shot Jews on a massive scale which debunks the film right there and then. Some of Cole's nitpicks about the small Auschwitz gas chamber are treated here: holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/05/rebutting-twitter-denial-most-popular.html#kremachimney holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/05/rebutting-twitter-denial-most-popular.html#flimsydoor

Also see "Debunking David Cole's Auschwitz video": holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/06/debunking-david-coles-auschwitz-video.html

All Cole debunked were misconceptions about the provisional small gas chamber (which was not in the extermination camp Birkenau in the first place and in which only a few gassings happened).

Sure, the Soviets tried to reconstruct the small gas chamber (after the crematorium morgue had been converted into an air-raid shelter) and partially botched the job, big deal. This doesn't refute the small gas chamber in the slightest, nor, of course, the big gas chambers at Birkenau.

The video is of course wrong about there being only witness evidence for mass extermination at Auschwitz:

holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2012/10/index-of-published-evidence-on.html holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/07/the-kinna-report-german-document-on.html

Aerial photos do show smoke: holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-auschwitz-open-air-incineration.html

The cyanide residue has been found: phdn.org/archives/holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/chemistry/iffr/report.shtml

Leuchter has been exposed as a fraud: holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/05/rebutting-twitter-denial-most-popular.html#idiotleuchter

The alleged photo fakery is dealt with here: holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/05/rebutting-twitter-denial-most-popular.html#photos

The "300,000 dead" argument is a lie, only registered inmates were meant in that footage, very obviously (the "official" figure was 4,000,000 after all).

The plaque argument is debunked here: holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/05/rebutting-twitter-denial-most-popular.html#auschwitzplaque

The First Holocaust nonsense is debunked here: holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/05/rebutting-twitter-denial-most-popular.html#firstholocaust

There are laws against denying the Communist crimes, the Armenian genocide and the law in Turkey that bans the assertion of the Armenian genocide, so the claim about the Holocaust being the only such event is another lie.

Of course, the author never ever deals with the extensive documentary evidence for the Holocaust, he's totally silent about the massacres of Jews like Babiy Yar or other mobile killing units massacres: holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/03/evidence-on-babi-yar-massacre-29-30.html holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2019/11/report-to-hitler-jews-executed-363211.html

Here is just a very small sample of documentary evidence in addition to all the links to documents already posted above:

holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/07/sonderkommando-kulmhof-in-german.html holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2012/04/jager-report.html holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2015/08/more-than-100-nazi-extermination.html holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2017/03/more-nazi-mass-murder-statements.html

This "chapter" of the film fell apart like a cheap suit, this means the rest of it is just as deceptive and not credible.