Untitled

/

Attached: untitled.jpg (538x307, 41.07K)

Why did they hate Jesus so much?

how unfortunate the camera was focused on this gentleman while the subtitles where quoting someone from the crowd

Because he told the truth.

The more I hear about this Barabbas fella the less I care for him.

He implies he is the son of God and therefore is a higher authority than the priests.

Jesus correctly named them as hypocrites

Some among them knew that Jesus needed to be killed to fulfill Isaiah and David's prophecies about the Messiah.

Attached: lmLI2Y2.jpg (538x717, 46.56K)

>Christ, you say?

Attached: 1495657990049.jpg (1920x800, 193.41K)

In the year 33AD, the Jewish High Priest Caiaphas had Jesus of Nazareth, the only begotten Son of God, executed by crucifixion in the Roman province of Judea. The execution was illegal by Roman *and* Jewish law. Three days after his unlawful murder, Jesus, also called The Christ, was raised from the dead and witnessed alive by over 500 people who testifed to what they had seen.

Amen brother. Christ is risen!

Source:

Attached: pauline epistles.jpg (960x540, 37.15K)

Jesus of Nazareth was a pretty cool guy, but he preached acceptance of Roman rule, which was very unpopular among the Jews at that time.

Jesus Barabbus (Jesus is a common name, like in Mexico today. It just means Yeshua, or Josh) was a scoundrel. He was a heretic who also claimed to be the son of God (Bar Abbus means "of the father"). He was a brigand, and all around unscrupulous guy. Everyone knew that he was shit, and a fake; but he strongly opposed the Romans; an occupying imperialist ethnic outgroup (who were bathed in Greek logical though which went against Jewish theological thought; and they were into and homo-pedophilia). The Jews wanted Romans to leave Judea so much; saying that the Romans should free Jesus Barabbus, instead of Jesus of Nazareth, was an intentional "fuck you" statement to the romans.

Some decades later; Emperor Hadrian would attempt to get deify his young male lover; and encourage that the twink be worshiped across the Empire. The Jews, at this point in history hating homosexuality, would try to rebel against the Romans. But they lost, and got slaughtered, and exiled to Gaul by Rome's homosexual pedophile Emperor.

Attached: sein1643465817708.jpg (300x300, 17.44K)

Barabbas also claims to be the son of God. So does Caesar. Roman money actually say, "Caesar, Son of God". Something like 20-ish Emperors were deified. There were a lot of "son of God"s back then.

Jesus never existed.

1. There are no Roman records of the crucifixion dating to the 1st century, every Roman source scholars resort to comes from the 2nd century forward. Utter silence about him and his claimed deeds pervades contemporaneous writings, unfitting of an extremely popular preacher whose alleged execution became such a massive public event involving the governor of Judaea (Matthew 27:11), an eclipse (Matthew 27:45), an earthquake (Matthew 27:51), and a zombie apocalypse (Matthew 27:52-53).

2. The earliest secular mention of Jesus is found in the so-called "Testimonium Flavianum," a blatant Christian adulteration of Flavius Josephus' Antiquities of the Jews. This shows how desperate the Christian community from the 3rd-4th centuries was over the lack of evidence for Jesus, and how dishonest they were to tamper with historical documents and forge evidence.

3. The biblical accounts are wholly contradictory and unreliable, authors demonstrate a lack of sound knowledge about basic things: Jesus forbidding divorce separately to women and men, despite the fact that women in his society could not get divorces (Mark 10:11-12); A geneology of Jesus tracing through the Davidic line that purports 14 generations between David and Jeconiah, which is inconsistent with the generational spread in 1 Chronicles 3 (Matthew 1:6-11); John's ignorance of the difference between Aramaic and Hebrew (John, 19:13); etc.

4. Key pieces of information from the gospels have no historical basis: Luke's absurd claim that the census required people to go back to their ancestral home (Luke 2:3); The Romans had no custom of freeing prisoners during Passover (Mark 15:6, Matthew 27:15, John 18:39, interpolated in Luke 23:17); The centurion had no reason to kill Jesus (John 19:34) since crucifixions were intended as a prolonged method of execution, and neither did Pilate to allow Joseph "The Plot Device" of Arimathaea to bury him (John 19:38); etc.

Lmao

Their messiah is said to exalt them above all, Jesus came for the whole world. Jews don't like this, called him a false son of God and crucified him. They are still waiting for their messiah, he will come. They are knowingly/unknowingly waiting for the anti christ

Because he was the rightful King of the Jews, instead of that faggot Herod

Barabbas went around raping people and was mentally ill. Dare I say the Jews have not changed in centuries? lmao

I'm not reading that neckbeard