I love Westerns so much bros

40? lmao i finished it after 275 hrs. Worth it

>*quick draws my revovler and shots you through the eye*
>"who's thirsty, boys?"

Attached: 1597024010211.png (225x225, 10.93K)

trash
unadulterated trash
western movies and books are so, so much better.

nobody asked

seethe, brainlet

I played 1, but couldn't get into it. The game is just much too limited. It seems at first like an open world game but it really isn't. You can barely do anything.

You saddled the wrong horse

I'm finna go hunting and fishing but I gotta get ready for work :/

Attached: g6lqd479lvb51.jpg (1200x1200, 80.09K)

I wanna see a guy wearing a whyte hat a guy with a black hat and I want to see them shooting each other up in front of the saloon.

This game is utterly kino and the nay sayers are gay. It has everything you could ever want

Ludonarrative dissonance are the words you're looking for
the most glaring example of devs fucking up to date

if you took the game, removed the quicktime evens that constitute gameplay nowadays, and just leave it as a film or series, it would be completely mediocre.
Sadly gamers are tasteless drones most of the time, so they don't realize how fucking shit the game is.

>no influence on your character
>no influence on the story
>no influence on the world
THEN WHY IS IT A FUCKING GAME

Boy are u one of them JRPG loving queers

2 is a lot better in that regard, I spent half of my time just exploring, hunting, fishing, the odd gunfight, and really just taking in the sights. It’s a great world to explore.

nah, that would be hella gay
I prefer games with actual gameplay, RPG's where I can actually influence the world and the story, not just a bad movie with quick time events tagged on

>no mexico
>mountains are either unclimbable or just barren
shit world to explore

I’ve noticed that jrpg trannies utterly seethe at any western game when Japanese games haven’t evolved since 1988

>no arguments
>words are just barren
Shit view point to explore

wish there were more movie-kino games.

>has no reading comprehension
not surprising from the kind of debilitated retard who unironically thinks that RDR2 is even a shadow of the former game

>playing RDR1
>come across a new town
>can't interact with NPCs
>can't even enter most buildings
>no shops or services offered
>no side quests anywhere
>no story or lore of any kind
>can't open any drawers, boxes, etc
>no items anywhere
>nothing to do whatsoever
>just keep moving on

True

Attached: 20220110204722_1.jpg (2560x1440, 404.63K)

Story is worse everything else is better. Shame there’s no undead nightmare 2, in short, I don’t really care what you think you bitter little thing.

It has wonky pacing and plotting. Playing the campaign again four years later just makes it obvious there's two drafts of the story sort of mashed together there, because there's just so much stuff that really goes nowhere. They really needed more time to do it just right, like they wanted to.

>no shops
wrong
>no side quests
wrong
>no story
wrong
>can't perform needless QTE events in lieu of actually playing the game
right
>nothing to do
lmao

>rdr1
>ride into random town
>random NPC gives you shit and challenges you to a duel/cheat at card games and create a duel
>win duel, flee to mexico
>get drunk, beat up a whore
>head back up north when things have calmed down
this is what a western should be

at least you admit the story is trash.
that's the first step, the second is looking at how limited your gameplay actually is. If you want to play any other way than the way the devs want, you'll quickly feel constrained and find out that it's an illusion.

Terminal case of BethReddit-content head, you need to unironically touch grass IRL

Attached: file.png (600x649, 91.83K)

>mini-map

Attached: 1633838997742.jpg (224x280, 7.3K)