.
Attached: 1637768372547.png (720x884, 395.71K)
.
>thanos was right
was he?
So was Hitler
Instead of going through the trouble of collecting the stones, why didn't he just force the whole universe to take mRNA vaccines?
>thanos is supposed to be MCU Hitler
>thanos was right
Wait that means...
maybe I should start tagging public bathrooms with Any Forums related phrases, someone might get a bit of a chuckle out of that
did this really happen ? i dont watch capeshit
my nutsack still smells like nutsack
Because that would kill close to 100% not 50
No. Think of the infinite expanse of the known universe which, even in the fictional Marvel universe, is still mostly empty. Then you have the "super hero" level geniuses like Tony Stark, Banner, Pym, and many others. Someone can work out a solution to the resource problem, if there even is one. One of the largest problems with Infinity War/Endgame is they never bothered to set up that Earth or any other known planet was experiencing any sort of resource shortage/overpopulation crisis. Thanos took an extreme solution to a problem that may not even exist in the MCU and, if it does, could very likely be solved by other means.
Too many niggers so yea
underrated
>infinite expanse
>universe
how do we know this?
based
is this for real?
extremely based
that was one of the first jokes when this shit was around. take the walk back
Even if he was, there's no way a random thug on the street even knew what Thanos's reasoning was.
The thing Thanos did wrong was making the snap random. He should have just got rid of all superheroes and certain other groups of troublesome people.
After the snap, the world economy probably exploded with fewer people but more goods. Crime probably dropped, social services probably improved because there was less people. More homes so less homeless, more jobs so less unemployment, ect.
Sneed was right.
>close to 100%
2 more weeks, am I right?
He could have wished for unlimited resources. What an idiot.
Yea every to weeks booster. Its the only way to be sure.
You're assuming any of those problems exist because of a lack of supply, rather than being the intentional, desired outcome of "the world economy"(and since the 80's, just the entire discipline of economics).
We could already just give all the homeless homes, there are places that have done it, it pretty much solved the problem and cost them less in the long run. Most people classed as "in poverty" in developed countries are already employed. Social services are typically underfunded many times over, halving the number of people needing help would barely make a dent. The problems of our society exist by design, to ensure everyone is so busy scraping to meet basic needs and blaming each other for that, they don't get any ideas about who might really be responsible. There's no reason at all to assume that the people in charge would allow that state of affairs to change, if anything they'd cling to power and their share of the spoils even harder.
His point was humans were growing at an unsustainable rate, and not doing anything to fix it. He wanted to punish them. Giving them unlimited resources would be rewarding them for bad behavior.