>they couldn't have used time turners against voldemort because it's too... LE DANGEROUS
>gives one to an 11yo so she can take more classes
BRAVO ROWLING
They couldn't have used time turners against voldemort because it's too... LE DANGEROUS
Hunter Collins
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Hudson Flores
>cant understand the concept of time turners only going back 4-6 hours
>the british did something stupid
Samuel Turner
>implying being able to turn back turn back time 4 hours whenever you want wouldn't provided an absolutely overwhelming advantage in a conflict
Isaiah Kelly
brainlet
giving it for doing classes was retarded as well
Juan Foster
you have to be wearing the time turner in the first place to turn back time. hermione had it in year 3, not year 4 or 5. just year 3. it was used properly.
Logan Powell
They didn't change a single thing going back in time. Everything already happened before they even went back in time, you dont actually change the past. It's amazing how people cannot understand something so simple.
Carson Barnes
That was retconed sweety. You can change the past, Hermione is black and the snack lady on the train is an all powerful spirit who guards the train.
Nicholas Baker
Nobody considers that canon sweety
Logan Mitchell
JK Rowling said it is canon. If you disagree you are a tranny lover.
Asher Morales
Yeah.
All time travel in sci-fi and fansaty should be avoided.
Once it’s possible in your universe there is no reason not to use it for important things. Removes all the stakes.
David Baker
>Everything already happened before they even went back in time
Yeah, because they chose to do it in the present.
So why didn't they choose to do it when fighting Voldemort?
Alexander Foster
All the time turners got destroyed during the fight with Death Eaters in Order of the Phoenix
Xavier Peterson
I mean in the original conflict.
Anthony Turner
The books and movies are canon, not some retarded play.
Justin Hill
Not that user but they could not use the time turners because destiny/ God said they would not. Harry Potter, like real life, is completely deterministic and people only have the illusion of free will.
Easton Lee
oh
Joshua Watson
The time turning doesn't change anything in Prisoner of Azkaban, it just shows you the same thing from two different perspectives. People unironically cannot follow a kids story.
Christian Murphy
the same reason Harry and Hermione didn't run into Hagrid's cabin and attack Peter the mouse
one of the most important rules is you must not be seen, another thing is you should not use it for personal gains
you can fuck up everything trying to use time turners against Voldemort and make things worse
Jaxson Martinez
>Time turner
>14 year old Hermione
William Martinez
If the rules are so crucial and the consequences for breaking them so devastating, why did they give it to an 11 year old to take extra classes?
Blake Cox
She was older than that and one of the smartest students regardless. I know this concept might be hard to understand.
William Morgan
Are you just pretending to be retarded?
>Harry using the patronis spell didn’t acktchualllly save his and Sirius’ lives
Luke Cox
Harry is literally saved by himself and the patronus before he even goes back in time, from his point of view. See how stupid you are? Nothing "changed" by going back in time.
Isaiah Butler
The extra classes thing was an excuse. Dumbledore knew it would be necessary so he gave it to one of his child soldiers with a thin pretense to make it look like he wasn't subverting the government. Cornelius Fudge was 100% right about that overly ambitious gay bastard.
Luke Parker
as I said I don't like the fact of using time travel for extra classes sane either but magic people do retarded stuff, very big chances of getting fucked up
Juan Brooks
That doesn’t answer the obvious question
>using time turners terribly dangerous and strictly off limits
>oh this little girl wants to learn a different thing at school instead of learning it next semester
>let’s throw ALL caution to the wind
>not at all a gaping plot hole!
Harry Potter apologists are so gay
Ian Ortiz
her arms look really long
Aiden King
>something I don't like is a plot hole
William Cox
A decision that you do not agree with is not a pothole.
Justin Powell
>Harry is literally saved by himself and the patronus before he even goes back in time,
>from his point of view.
lol lmao
David Sanders
feels good to win for once bros
Carson Campbell
The time turning is a loop. Sirius was always saved, even before Harry went back in time. That's how fictional time travel is depicted here.
Carson Jones
In Galaxy Quest they can only go back 10 seconds and that makes a difference.
