Кaк Poccия бyдeт дeйcтвoвaть дaльшe? Пo плaнy!

>Кaк Poccия бyдeт дeйcтвoвaть дaльшe? Пo плaнy!
2 weeks later, pic related.

Attached: 1646046144478.png (986x808, 109.75K)

Other urls found in this thread:

kyivindependent.com/national/how-many-tanks-does-russia-really-have
youtu.be/eHhgVrKJJoA
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Russia is still gonna end up winning this war

Why wasn't Kharkov taken early on in the war?

i guarantee you couldn't even define what "winning" would be if i put it to you.

3 days they originally said, if you support that good for you, you are on the kill list.

Z more weeks

Because russia only has the 2nd best army in the world

Best at what? Being corrupt and useless?

At PR mostly. They had some really manly recruiting ads, I hear.

Where are VDV and modern equipment?

Come on, Russiaboy. Respond to the thread.
I know you want to.

Attached: 1659807130074.webm (360x198, 141.37K)

retaking Donbass, and southern Ukraine up to Transnistria, and having this codified or a prolonged ceasefire like North and South Korea

Russia is still kicking hohol ass. Once they start warring for real, it's over for the salomunchers.

Seems unlikely considering the glacial gains of the Russian army that got wiped out in days recently. And even this scenario would be considered a nightmarish loss scenario if you were to be considering the situation from the start of the war.

>winning
Define 'winning'.

Attached: 1654359765276.png (629x711, 270.87K)

War with what? All modern tanks are destroyed, VDV dead, missiles all fired, arty guns getting weary and munitions soon be lacking

It's over

>retaking Donbass
Impossible even in the first days of the war due to fortifications
> southern Ukraine up to Transnistria
Impossible, Ukraine cut all supplies in the Kherson poche
>and having this codified or a prolonged ceasefire like North and South Korea
Lmao

Depends on whether Putin steps up his mobilisation efforts over winter. I imagine he will because he can't afford a loss politically. Sending only 200k troops was clearly not enough and they woefully underestimated Ukraine, but they can still make a comeback

They have nothing to send but penitential battalion, all modern tank are lost, VDV and elite troops are dead with all their modern equipment

>but they can still make a comeback
With what? Iranian drones, North Korean shells and rusted tanks from the 80s and 70s?
kyivindependent.com/national/how-many-tanks-does-russia-really-have

How is he supposed to send a larger force when Russian logistics were too weak to support the initial invasion force?

That depends on a few things.
Do they actually have the equipment needed to supply a vastly larger force?
Do they have the logistics needed to sustain and supply them?
Are they willing to divide the available support, logistics and equipment from their current forces to quickly trained and poorly motivated conscripts?
Are they willing to suffer the losses associated with pushing into a fortified line with manpower being the only major advantage?
Are they concerned with putting weapons in the hands of thousands of young Russian men who didn't sign up for the war voluntarily and may have second thoughts about being forced to go fight in an unpopular war?

>he didn't know it was a month long plan

>kyivindependent.com
KEK

They only have the second best army in Ukraine

> they can still make a comeback
What IS the comeback though? It seemed they started with a plan to blitz into Kiev and install a puppet government. After that all is make something up as it goes. What is the win condition now?

is it true that full mobilization is expected to be announced next Monday in Russia and we won't see Russian posters anymore?

lol

Here is a video of guy coming up with arguably the same result 4 month ago. What's your problem with that?
youtu.be/eHhgVrKJJoA

That would be rad

what is a "win" here

At this point the only victory scenario Putin is likely concerned about is personal survival.