The history leading up to New Hollywood in the 60s sounds pretty familiar

>advent of television (streaming) cutting into theater profits
>studios using bigger and bigger "spectacle" to retain audiences but it doesn't work
>economic downturn and repeated flops
>leads to innovation and risk raking allowing greater control by younger directors and producers
Are these new generation of studio execs too stupid to realize this though? It seems like they'd rather double down on IP and CGI capeshit garbage forever, rather than take a risk on new writers and directors.

Attached: 43426267565.png (1683x519, 96.82K)

New New Hollywood is coming boys

The censorship used to be coming from old Christians, now it's coming from young woketards

Nu Hollywood or Neo Hollywood?

Those who've never had a plant burger and refused the vax shall inherit the box office

Do yourself a favor and look up censorship, and then maybe do yourself another favor and talk to a professional about your persecution complex. Nobody is censoring you, they're choosing what to support based on their values, that's capitalism. If the fact that Black people used to be almost entirely excluded from starring roles, and now they get at most 1-2 a year is so upsetting to you, maybe stay home.

It's not going to happen again. Everything is too homogenized these days. And the New Hollywood directors were independently financed whereas now "independent" filmmakers are just funneled into A24

With Chinese characteristics

>Do yourself a favor and look up censorship, and then maybe do yourself another favor and talk to a professional about your persecution complex. Nobody is censoring you, they're choosing what to support based on their values, that's capitalism. If the fact that Black people used to be almost entirely excluded from starring roles, and now they get at most 1-2 a year is so upsetting to you, maybe stay home.

Attached: 5.png (769x538, 159.38K)

Doesn't matter. Everything is focus grouped to capture the largest target audience possible.

Well user OP, let me say, for once...a decent /tv thread has appeared thanks to you. A real rarity.

So let's start with the basics:
Remember...it's a business first, with humans involved...so any true innovation is subsumed with product creation for money first in cycles before those collapse, and innovation occurs (as you pointed out).

The lead in to those cycles are some rare creative media, and some assembly line media.
It's like old youtube and the trash e-celebs of now...commercialized.

So it will happen that more individual content, using basic psychology of social engineering will occur, to retain more individuals, therefore, more groups, therefore, larger groups of people instead of the shotgun blast of hit or miss like the old days, where they tried to force the trend with shitty westerns or what-have-you & Clint Eastwood comes thru to destroy all that.

However, he became the norm, which destroyed it completely until one-off's here and there.

Corporation leads to innovation individually leads to assembly line leads to commercialisation leads to death of genre leads to innovation.

A viscous cycle. Very fluid. And retarded/slowed down by "yes men", ass-kissers, nepotism, sex criminals, regular criminals, etc.

Pop-up movie stars and tv shows are definitely going to be a thing.

Attached: Yes I mean you.jpg (625x625, 132.81K)

>free people choose to see media that actually bothers to represent them
>companies take notice, and start making more media that actually represents the demographics of a modern audience instead of an audience from the old confederacy
>"oh no, I'm being censored!"
Stop taking life cues from Any Forums infographics and try to get your bearings here in the real world, maybe you'll realize how ridiculous you are. The irony is that people like you actually DO want to censor films from having the most marketable cast, or from selecting the best actor, to suit some inane bias.

>marxist oppression olympics narrative forced into college curriculum
>bigotry of low expectations prioritizing nonciswhites arbitrarily
>enforced diversity of skin color; uniformity of thought
Yeah that's not capitalism or "progress" bro

bruh no one mentioned anything close to persecution

yes, the corporate funded/maintained "indie" genre was basically created by the new hollywood guys to prevent another new hollywood.

My man, you're literally claiming that right wing straight white men are an oppressed minority because capitalism is always siding with minorities. You are beyond salvation.

how can you still hold this opinion honestly? I truly don't understand.

The nerdy jewish boys that wrote good Hollywood scripts seem to have played themselves, since they are seen as white. Much like with journalism, their BIPOC, Latinx replacements are not as sharp or introspective for good writing.

the problem with this narrative is they don't care. no one does. no one likes it when corporations try to pander to them, because its always disingenuous, condescending, and worst of all, cheap.

>capitalism
needs ((())))

>Studio system is going down!
two more weeks

Classic golem turning on its creator.

Disney's treatment of Star Wars completely disproves this retarded narrative.