Can he really be considered a "filmmaker"?

Can he really be considered a "filmmaker"?

Attached: kevin-smith-gty-ml-180226_16x9_992.jpg (992x558, 58.7K)

No.

Who keeps funding all of his movies? Aren’t they always losing money?

no, since he doesn't make films. he makes things that merely resemble films

i consider him a "massive soiboy"

>always a backwards white hat
why some fags always have the same hat on? Making a single piece of clothing part of your personality is cringe. Other notable example is Jack Met - the lead singer for AJR with his fur hat

you zoomiots have clearly never watched everything he did up till Dogma

I mean he's made films, isn't that the only requirement? He's just a bad film maker

ZOOMBECILES!

Surviving the heart attack was a mistake

if Clerks was in color instead of black and white, he'd have gone the way of Troy Duffy

why does his head look too small for his body?

Clerks 3 trailer was pretty depressing but most of his fans say it was great. It wasn't. I'll watch it put of nostalgia but I don't expect anything from it.

No, he's a scriptwriter. He never learned how to do anything beyond that besides turn on a camera and point it at a conversation.

No. He's a "flickcreator".

also, Tusk is an underrated gross-out horror movie, literally the American Human Centipede, and props to him for taking the risk of making it

He has money to spend on his own movies.

The thinking man's Nolan desu senpai

>Can we forget about the things i said when i was drunk

He hasn't acted like a human since his heart attack
something is seriously wrong with him and not just his defective heart.

Let's see your work OP