This is the NatGeo study that, together with the USGS and NOAA, determined which cities in the world would be under water if the level of the oceans rose only 65 mts. (216 feet)
Thoughts?
This is the NatGeo study that, together with the USGS and NOAA...
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
>only 65 meters
>only
I know I'm fucked when the level rises that much but nigga do you really think it will rise 65 goddamn meters, that's some straight up laughable Greta climate fear-pr0n, kek
holy kino, that map looks better than the current one.
I did that same study in 2013 when I was studying using the exact same data
>Midwest unaffected
>Coasties seething
Bring it on.
What would happen when that empty lake in Russia gets connected to the ocean? A wall of water?
>germans, anglos, han chinese, and florida hit the hardest
Based neptune taking out the trash
>build polders
>problem solved
Pas mon problème
are you trying to say swimmable cities are a bad thing?
No, if we are responsible with our environment and take the necessary measures: as long as China, the US and the European Union continue to emit more carbon dioxide gases, your underwater destiny will be inexorable.
I wish. A good splash would do this gay ass society well, Unfortunately all is just a storm in a glass of water, that's what we make of it at least. Nothing too big ever happens, no matter how much climate cultists think it will. But thank god for paper straws instead of plastic ones. The planet is saved now.
I wouldnt mind the loss of those cities
Imagine how kino will it be to dive in underwater european cities
Barcelona completely erased from the map? Yes, God, yes!
>vancouver
>montreal
is there any way to make it happen faster?
Beach in Bihar
Nice
We playing the long game
just flood africa with the extra water and revive lake mega-chad
The numbers have spoken. Mother Nature, make it so.
Based
That's is all the glaciers melted which would take hundreds of years to happen.
>most cosmopolitan city slickers will drown
that's my dream
I'm just glad that R*nders just barely avoided being saved by the Aarhus hills.
>Africa makes off the best
lol
But in reality the world's richest nations aren't just gonna allow 15% of their country to be flooded are they
Everywhere is gonna be like the Netherlands
based safe kazakhstan
I heard it will only rise a few mm per year. The climate models are are estimates so no one really know how much co2 emissions will effect temperature, which means they don't know how much it will effect melting ice and increased sea levels.
But it seems they prefer it this way, to use some unfalsifiable data and then call it The Science, because it becomes like a religious dogma that you can't question nor disprove and they can use this to control you.
Instead if they focused on measurable things like air or water pollution, chemical or plastic waste, environmental damage and pollution-related health conditions, they would have to be held accountable for their claims and we would have a way of measuring if their policy worked or not.
The way they run climate policy now is just a way for activists, governments and powerful people to hoard and control power. Any scientist who wants to get money has to play along. The bigger the problem, the more funding you get, this is selective pressure to create an atmosphere of everyone screaming about the end of the world.
en.wikipedia.org
Think again.