How come Indians never colonized Africa? Geographically, it was way easier for them than for Europe
How come Indians never colonized Africa? Geographically, it was way easier for them than for Europe
Asher Morgan
Other urls found in this thread:
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Isaac Hughes
No naval culture
Jeremiah Martinez
Now that you mention it. How come Arabs didn't colonize Africa on the scale that Euros did to the Americas? They set up outposts and trade hubs but for some reason they never what Euros did.
Luis Murphy
Disease
Instead they got a whole bunch of slaves from there
en.m.wikipedia.org
Adrian Green
large escale colonization is impossible without industrialization, and besides, why would they? they were in the middle of all the big trade routes, there's no stimuli for overseas expansion
William Nelson
There was a decent amount of Arab influence and expansion into Africa, but by the time full colonization of Africa was feasible in 1860s, Europe was miles ahead of Arabs.
Leo Cruz
Because deep colonisation is a 19th century thing unless the natives drop dead (and even then the Americas weren’t intensely populated until the late 19th century). Africa had a bunch of natives and diseases which made outright conquest tricky.
Brody Reyes
Arabs colonized a good bunch of Africa. All eastern coast, even mozambique. Northern parts of subsaharan like Niger etc. They just didnt bother to go further west. Also they didnt want to live because malaria.
Nolan Bennett
Because Ethiopia blocked their path of expansion and crossing the Sahara is way too dangerous
Jace Nelson
Only white people are soulless enough to justify colonialism.
Joshua Cooper
india wasn't a united country and they were too busy fighting each other
Parker Thompson
ahem
wasn't exactly colonialism howthoughever
Mason Walker
go back shitskin
Jaxson Walker
Completely different technological and economic contexts, colonization was mostly profitable in order to do extractive activities for industrial purposes and only ever plausible because of firearms and relatively advanced medicine.
Americas had sickness as a great factor and technological adventage by miles (americans had no livestock to survive without good terrain for farming, neither they had mounts, nor they had resistance to sickness or smithing)
Afrikans were already into such tech millenia ago.
Also you have the routes, eastern africa was way harder to fight in ancient times than west africa
Blake Martinez
Colonizing n1gg3rs makes you gain sympathy for them
Indians realised this early on when our ancestors came from Steppe and hunted down local Asiatic n1gg3rs (Onge tribesmen) only to gain sympathy for them.
This is why Brahmins restricted sea travel and stayed in India.
The only people Brahmins interacted with were high IQ chinks and sea chinks and spread their religion to them. Turning both chinkland and sea first Hindu and then Buddhist
The people who brought n1gg3rs to India were Muzzies becuase Muzzies themselves are sandn1gg3rs.
Muzzy women in India regularly had American style sex with n1gg3r sl@v3s and produced black babies. This is also why many Persians, Pakis, and Indian Muslims have n1gg3r dna.
Anglos will also turn out like that. 100 years down every Anglo will have 5-10% n1g33r c00n dna phahahahahhahaha.
Colton Torres
How many layers of schizophrenia are you on my friend?
Xavier Nguyen
What do you think North Africa is?
Nathan Brooks
I would tell you but I don't want to be banned today.
Caleb Green
E V R O P A
Gabriel Scott
dont think oman ever controlled somalia, they used to actually pay tribute to somalis for using one of their ports iirc
Asher Richardson
squizoposters are entertaining, I hadn't seen him in a while
Bentley Watson
Muslim, but the natural religion of browns is either Islam or Catholicism. Or that other one... So it wasn't colonialism. It's only colonialism if the conquering party is Protestant. Since browns being protestants is unnatural.
Joseph Ramirez
>Since browns being protestants is unnatural.
not in my country