Well? why is it?

well? why is it?

Attached: 1654746843365.jpg (750x795, 74.88K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_Climax_Corporation#Child_pornography
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

did they really?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_Climax_Corporation#Child_pornography

Attached: 1662524716826406.png (1635x157, 32.25K)

Thanks for spreading the word about this. It's appalling how few people know.

>neil steinberg

Attached: 1662531562260.jpg (680x536, 190.53K)

Who the fuck is AuthRight?

Because we need something to protect the children from the hoards of pedonesians

Single Sign on application

refers to the political compass which personality-let Any Forums and reddit users love dearly

Authoritarian Right on the political compass.
Political Compass is a 2D representation of Social and Economical ideas a person, ideology or a group can have doe it does not measure progressive-conservative ideas, a staple of American politics as they all fall in the same Center-Right space, a second 1D bar can fulfill that need quite easily doe it obfuscates the compass via complexity.

Attached: IMG_20220907_083247.jpg (1080x1082, 284K)

Code for incel

Back to r/PCM

yea, the sexual revolution was taken further in Europe than the US. But the supreme court decision that upheld that was not unanimous.
It's not New York v. Ferber. there was an earlier case in the 70's I think. I can't find it for the life of me. And I know i've found the wiki before.

Anyone?

lib-left is the opposite of science, what a retarded pic
>evolution? natural selection? genetics? not real!
>what do you mean humans are tied to the environment they are born in and for? races is a social construct!
>nuclear energy bad!

That cute, now give me you ame hentai collection

I found it.
It's actually later lol.
Osborne v. Ohio
Which concerns procession. While New York v. Ferber concerns distribution.

Not a unanimous decision.

The government has a very compelling interest in preventing the sexual exploitation of children.[2][3]

Distribution of visual depictions of children engaged in sexual activity is intrinsically related to the sexual abuse of children. The images serve as a permanent reminder of the abuse, and it is necessary for government to regulate the channels of distributing such images if it is to be able to eliminate the production of child pornography.

Advertising and selling child pornography provides an economic motive for producing child pornography.[2]

Visual depictions of children engaged in sexual activity have negligible artistic value.

cp was not explicitly outlawed in Denmark before 1985 so technically they didn't break the law

i was baiting for gunfags and you niggers are wasting so much focus on child porn, kill yourselves

Attached: 1596697799057.jpg (1100x1007, 99.47K)

Attached: 1647540854981.jpg (244x206, 5.54K)

I'm gonna post this on /k/ and steal your (You)s

>Denmark
It checks out, with no exaggeration Denmark was probably the country which went the furthest with sexual revolution. Pretty sure they also had bestiality stuff produced, though you should know we're talking about like ~20 people total involved, it obviously wasn't a huge industry.