A philosopher once said, "An idiot admires complexity, a genius admires simplicity, a physicist tries to make it simple, for an idiot anything the more complicated it is the more he will admire it"
What do people in your country think about this ?
A philosopher once said, "An idiot admires complexity, a genius admires simplicity, a physicist tries to make it simple...
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
simplicity in what context?
*you're
I think the philosoher is an idiot, the first two lines already explained the concept well enough
I think it says a lot about people enjoying hyper realism in art
Gay
Plot twist: OP added the second half
mostly when creating something (or explaining)
hyper realism is retarded
why not just take a picture instead?
Photos can't capture the aesthetic
My man green japan
Also as a physics major I can tell you this is blatantly false.
based serge poster
>A physics major is a science degree path that helps explain how the world works
>Bottom tier physicist
Modern art is the retard tier one.
>Realistic art enjoyers
That painting of the monastery is beautiful
>Modern art fans
UHM YOU DON'T LIKE THIS BANANA I SHAT ON? LET ME EXPLAIN TO YOU WHY IT ACTUALLY REPRESENTS A NEO-CARTHESIAN POST-MARXIST PLUTOCRATIC IDEAL AND YOU ARE AN IDIOTIC PLEBIAN FOR NOT APPRECIATING IT'S SINO-BRUTALISTIC FORM
Shit bait
Try justifying empirically undetectable """virtual""" particles being used to explain how forces are transferred between interacting particles.
en.wikipedia.org
Empirical evidence is given under the section "Manifestations".
that's your job. make things simpler
Literally 0 mentions of a single "virtual particle" being detected. You could replace it with "God" and it would mean roughly the same thing.
lol It's never gonna happen, modern STEM is full of actual cultists who treat established theories as cannon because they were brought into it by pop-sci garbage that taught them to idealise them. The moment you propose an alternative theory, it gets laughed off.
You don't detect a virtual particle, but you detect its effects, such as the magnetic field. From what I've understood, virtual particles are just another way of saying fields. You can detect fields. For example, if you shoot an electron between charged plates, you will observe that the electron's path wasn't a straight line, i.e., the path bends. This is a direct consequence of the electric field between charged plates.
Which philosopher?