It's not that bad. I mean, it's bad, sure, but not that bad.
There's something weird here with all the sequels. They're bad, but at the same time, they're fun to watch. Has anyone else caught themselves thinking that? The main failure, of course, is the change of actor. If they had made a deal with the original actor, the movie would have gone from a 2/10 to an 6-7/10. I liked the psychopathy of the actors, the family traumas, the sex themes.
>Has anyone else caught themselves thinking that
No? Out of all shitty sequels this takes the cake. Awful overacting. Nanobudget. Filmed on digital with fidelity of a porn film. Literally feels like a parody. Picrel. I understand liking Inferno or some other shitty script they shoved cenobites into. But this garbage, that is now clearly was made to keep the license? Get the contrarian dildo out of your bussy player.
>I understand liking Inferno
Inferno was comfy, cenobitic were forced but deff enjoyable
centobites are often named for their most distinguishing feature, none more so then the many times pierced hellpriest leader of the order known as Three Chins.
I understand. But why as a parody? I really liked the family theme. But, of course, the film doesn't really hold up. I also feel sorry for the actor who plays Pinhead. You can see he's trying very hard, but he just doesn't fit the role at all.
>We have such recipes to show you
Because of how edgy and try hard it's trying to be. And what family theme? The reason they are in that house is because they had no money for more than 2 locations. Hence they pretend that family drama and infidelity justifies this retarded plot of kids going on edge spree.
i dont get the hate for this guy, does he not look scary to you guys?
>the milkshakes on the counter wept
So scary I put a lock on my fridge.
>And to think.....I hesitated on seconds....
Most of the sequels (I think five through eight) were just unrelated horror scripts that were bought for cheap and had cenboites slapped into them so the publisher could keep the rights. They aren't terrible but it's obvious very little effort went into them.
The original and Inferno are the only good Hellraiser movies. Bloodlines is like a 5/10 or 6/10 with a 10/10 payoff, 2 is fun and full of soul but ultimately shit, 3 is complete ass. With all the low ratings the sequels received, I was expecting the movies after 2 to be shit and now I realize it's just absolute drooling retards being like "b-buh... where is the guy with pins in head???? this not hellraiser movie! durrr!". Inferno is the only one so far that is remotely similar to the original, the cenobites and the lament configuration should have remained a mysterious overarching force with the focus being on the characters of their respective films.
Hellraiser 1-5 are all fine sequels.
As far as Inferno goes, that is a false rumor. It was always intended as a Hellraiser movie.
Block your way.
You know if you pulled one of his pins out it would have a shrimp and a hunk of onion and red pepper on it.
There is literally nothing redeemable about this movie. You have shit taste, OP. I assume you're autistic.
There is actual a coupon on the dvd you can redeem for a hellfire taco from taco bell.
i have an action figure of this guy including his umbilical cord thing
Kek
Well then, I stand corrected.
I get that they'd have to replace Doug Bradley eventually, but fuck. How did they do the make-up test on this guy and think that looked okay?