Why is it always the most turkish-looking Serbs who are the most nationalist?

Why is it always the most turkish-looking Serbs who are the most nationalist?

Attached: 1638278718957.jpg (1280x720, 68.04K)

Other urls found in this thread:

med-gen.ru/ar/ar_Balanovsky.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Same all over EE. Not only are they brown but they never fail to be extreme pro-Russian shills

true, like bulgarians

You're one to know for sure

germany won't save you.
Z

Attached: istockphoto-152514363-612x612.jpg (612x406, 19.25K)

It's literally just cope

they all are

yes because Italy is full of bulgarians Also italian are noto white

honorary KARA BOGA(god's punishment) to wypipo
Z

Why are Ukrainians so nazi and racist? Lol

Because most balkanoids aren't genetic slavs but rather are slavic-speaking. In the case of Serbs they obviously have turkic roots, despite their orthodox religion and slavic language.

>slavic-speaking
Even their languages have borrowed plenty of turkish words
I don't feel any kinship towards Serb, Macedonian and Bulgarian "slavs". They are about as close to us as Arabs

Illyro-Thracian-Byzantine blood predisposes them to patriotism and violence.

Redpill me on Bulgarians
Are they Turks in self denial? Do they love or hate Russia, Serbia, Greece? How are they viewed in the region?
They're fascinating
They have an interesting military history as well

t. Mongol

they actually are extremely slavic
the least slavic among them are macedonians that are 50% slavic

white genes are very weak

desu many words in Russian and Ukrainian also have non-slavic origin. Maidan (square in Ukrainian) comes from the arabic word Meydan. Similar examples can be found in Russian.
>Croat offended that a Russian argued that he wasn't a true slav
Funny thing is that Croat nationalists agreed and during WWII insisted that Croats were slavinized decendents of Goths.

Mongols ruled Russia for a roughly same time period as Turks ruled Serbia, and Mongols were much more tolerant of rape and interethnic interreligious marriages than Turks, so it makes perfect sense that you are more Mongol than Serbs are Turk.

>Croat
>Defends Serbs
But to be serious, genetically speaking Russians fragment into Northen Russians (who are not "pure" slavs and have some finno-ugric admixture) and Southern Russians, who are genetically speaking the same kind of people as Ukrainians, Belarusians, Poles and so on.
Although in practise this dosen't really matter, since nation states nowadays are civic conceptions, united by things like a common language, culture, traditions and so on.
med-gen.ru/ar/ar_Balanovsky.pdf

>50 pages of Byzantine runes
I can't read that, m8.

filtered

>In the case of Serbs they obviously have turkic roots, despite their orthodox religion and slavic language.
Wrong.
The entire identity of Turk is based on an inferiority complex and nationalist propaganda from the state.
That's why Turks can be isamists and degenerate globohomists in the same vicinity .
There's no uniform because they're a mentally enslaved people that don't know what they are.
Every Serb knows what they are. Slavic heritage and Orthodoxism are core tenets in the Serbian identity.

Stop using "Turkish" or "Arab" as an insult or I'll bash your head

Attached: 1653945051638.jpg (1920x1080, 213.03K)