Men wouldn't go bald unless there was an evolutionary advantage

Men wouldn't go bald unless there was an evolutionary advantage.

Therefore, white men are high evolved.

Right?

Attached: bald.png (804x604, 731.46K)

Other urls found in this thread:

vndb.org/v57
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Is this the VN where you play as a student in a school for disabled/disfigured students?

nah thats katawa shoujo
this is the vn where shes from: vndb.org/v57

I think it serves as a reminder of mortality and kicks in the fear of ageing/death which in turn spurs on the urge to breed to distract and alleviate oneself from these thoughts.

Men who go through no such revaluation may go through life care free until they're too old to sustain a child.

Doesn't really make any sense. White people have one of the lowest birthrates in the world.

hea retarded. balding is probably just something we got from pollution or inheritance from other humanoid types like neanderthal

we should make a Any Forums vn. We can already make it quickly now that stable diffusion has been released.

damn it baldbros, why can't medicine focus on getting our hair back instead of trying to cure some stupid bullshit like AIDS or Alzheimers

that's not true, the lowest birthrates in the world belong to east asians who are the least predisposed to balding
arabs aren't any less likely to bald than whites and have birthrates several times higher. Birthrates are tied to infant mortality, income and living standards, in particular the ones of women.

no single trait is exempt from the process of natural selection, no characteristic is by accident, and certainly not something as prevalent as balding which affects 70%+ of the male population at a certain point in their lives. If it were detrimental it would have been selected out but it hasn't. The mystery is why it's so prevalent, the rates of balding in humans suggests it is in some way advantageous, and if that is the case the reason is likely an innate subconscious reaction such as the one I suggested, because we know women are more attracted to a full head of hair.
It is not caused by "pollution" it is caused by the androgen DHT shrinking the hair follicles.
It is not tied to Neanderthals as niggers also experience it.

It's just a side effect of testosterone, like prostate illnesses

>If it were detrimental it would have been selected out but it hasn't
That's not how evolution works. Evolution just passes on what's good enough to survive; not what's ideal.

why would it be advantageous to lose head hair?

ikr fuck things like helping people with dementia or some shit our looks are more important.

exactly!

maybe because hair serves as an excellent breeding ground for bacteria and parasites.
maybe because a bare head has incentivized us to create hats (40% of our body heat escapes through the head) thus giving a survival advantage to those proficient in tool use.
maybe the reason is psychological and it invokes the realization of our mortality.
who knows. I'm not a biologist.

It doesn't serve as an advantage, you moron; I already told you that not everything that gets passed on is advantageous. At best it doesn't make you look much worse, at worst it makes you depressed and makes it harder for you to attract someone.

MENA people have the highest rate of baldness

if it weren't advantageous it would not occur in the majority of the population and would be a fringe trait.
I wasn't going to post this because it's kind of esoteric and probably better off kept secret if it's true, but maybe it is because we're a gregarious species and people tend to give favor to the individuals who share their own traits and characteristics, so maybe just maybe there is some kind of several millennia long collusion between bald men to share recourses and grant jobs and marry off daughters amongst each other, excluding those who are not bald resulting in a higher social standing and greater wealth between the balds than the bald-nots.
have you ever noticed how the jewish yarmulke covers exactly the bald spot on men's heads? curious isn't it??

Attached: 1533502324261.png (469x452, 276.67K)

>if it weren't advantageous it would not occur in the majority of the population
Yes it would you retard. Negative traits get passed on in evolution as long as it doesn't ruin survival. There's tons of beings that have remained the same/nearly the same for thousands of years but are flawed.

Male balding genes can be passed on by mother who has no visual cues of carrying them. It also manifests at different age for males, so somebody can still have a child while there are no signs of balding yet. That said, it doesn't pose any danger or detriment outside of self-esteem issues.

why would a gene that forces humans to expend energy in creating outerwear be in any way advantageous? it stuck around in the gene pool because resourceful men can outdo (outhink) their balding, but in a natural setting, with controlled variables, the balding does not translate into reproductive sucess. our ingenious reactions to balding as humans have only made it perhaps more prevalent, if anything