Modern diet is bad even though we're taller...

Modern diet is bad even though we're taller, live longer and are overall healthier than those who live merely a few generations before us as a result of it

Attached: 7970 - animated antenna clothes glasses grin open_mouth orange_eyes reddit soyjak stubble tshirt variant_el_perro_rabioso.gif (500x500, 896.92K)

Other urls found in this thread:

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15637215/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

reddit wouldn't say that thoughever. it's 100% a 4chanlet thing.

soyquote fail

>MICROOOOOOPLAAAAASTIIIIIIICSSSSS FLUOOOORIIIIIIDDDEEEEEEE GMMMMOOOOOOOSSSSSS

Attached: 1661030792760854.gif (228x255, 96.69K)

people see something has a chemical they dont recognize in the ingredients or they think the process to make it is "a lab" and think its not healthy
ive seen americans argue that its okay to use butter over cooking oil because butter is natural and cooking oil is not

>Overall healthier

Objectively not true, maybe in comparison to dirt poor starving peasants but obesity has skyrocketed in the last few decades, literally anyone from around the 1950s would be healthier than most today

NEW......LE BAD.
OLD.......LE GOOD.

Attached: soyboy1210.jpg (680x680, 35.44K)

you forgot your meme arrow therefore you say that and look like that

>industrial food le good

The people who complain about it are probably the people who aren't personally doing very well on it. Evolution applies to the group at large, not the individual. Individuals don't adapt, they either do well or they suffer and die so that the next generation will be better off on average.

This but also
This

>industrial food
define

>literally anyone from around the 1950s would be healthier than most today
meh, in some ways sure

Attached: life expectancy.png (800x1153, 470.35K)

Yes, unironically.

lifespan has increased due to curing diseases. if the diet was better it would be even higher

a few generations before people unironically starved and lacked basic nutrients

Life expectancy has almost nothing to do with food, except in the modern cases the extremely unhealthy diets that cause diabetes etc. It's healthcare more than anything and safety after that.

>lifespan has increased due to curing diseases
*mostly due to reduction in childhoods mortality
In pic related, in 1850, life expectancy *at birth* was 41.6 but *at 20 year* it was 60 which is worse than now but not nearly as bad.

Forgot pic. It depends if it's life expectancy *at birth* which is more related to nutrition of the mother and baby.

Attached: Life-expectancy-by-age-in-the-UK-1700-to-2013-768x511.png (768x511, 273.58K)

>live longer
Infant mortality pushed the average down. If you calculated life expectancy for those who survived into adulthood it would only be marginally lower and thats because of advancements in medicine
>overall healthier
Probably not. People could get fucked up for life by infections in the past. But that's because of a lack of antibiotics and not diet.
>Are taller
I'll give you that. People have way more access to protein.

>Changes in USDA food composition data for 43 garden crops, 1950 to 1999
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15637215/

Yes and no. Diseases and infections from food has also drastically decreased because we take care of meat and food better than ever.

Attached: trichinellosis_graph_year2.jpg (536x375, 36.02K)

Saying that cooking oil is poison and should be avoided I can understand, but when someone starts going off about how carbs are bad for you, I just know they're a fucking retard beyond belief. Nigga, fuck you, I like oats and potatoes.

buh but muh plant based crab cakes