Has exposure to other nationalities and cultures on Any Forums made you less prejudiced?

Has exposure to other nationalities and cultures on Any Forums made you less prejudiced?

Attached: 1615851947429.png (1596x3104, 1.3M)

More prejudiced.

Opinion on Russia is more important than skin tone or religious beliefs.

Attached: 1650975993818.png (452x332, 248.55K)

Most of the posters on this board are a vocal minority that define the flags reputation. I am not dumb enough to judge nations via this site

Less prejudiced apart from Brazilians, I hope they all die of aids and zikavirus

I am a communist

Attached: bait.jpg (600x600, 37.37K)

I just hate foreign cultures, it just so happens that most foreign looking people are foreigners at heart.

Made me dislike third-worlders even more, somehow. Which I wasn't even aware was possible.

Go back to preddit

Attached: Morshu_pointing_to_kids.jpg (384x239, 17.35K)

It has confirmed every prejudice I had.

I now have a deep disdain for Canada and Canadians.

Obsessed.

Come over here and say that to my face pussy

global rule 3 is gay as hell

I would but I'm to poor to travel >:^[

Nigger!

Attached: 1661001061118.jpg (238x400, 62.17K)

>words words words

Attached: 213[1].jpg (1080x745, 70.27K)

why are leftoids meme the same everywhere

based

Attached: 1632167502592.png (2260x3576, 744.99K)

Hm... I think this place has taught me an imporant lesson about conflict, yes. Whenever there are two groups of people with any difference, perceived or otherwise, and interests do not align 100% (and of course in reality it'll never be 100%), conflict arises. Whether it is between sexual groups, social groups, ethnicities, political groups, etc. a disparaity in poinions leads to conflict. On this I've seen people behave in three ways: trying to patiently find a solution taht pelases both parties (useful, but sometimes impossible because certain things REQUIRE someone to lose something), those that argue for their own side with no consideration for the other side, demanding absolute submission (which is the people writing constant long paragraphs, jokes, and info about how bad the opponent's team is) and lastly, those who take the matter personally and start attacking each other directly, instead of their groups. In the end, seeing how ineffective the first group are, how conflictive and self-sustaining they are (sometimes never reaching a solution and going into a neverending insult-flinging bout), and lastly, how viciously uncooperative the third are, even when given what they wanted, since the matter has been taken over by their personal biases and narcissism... in the end I realize that in the real world, someone HAS to win. Until someone "wins" there is no end to conflict. How screwed up is our species that we require losers to exist, just so we can actually move on and build anything of use, ignoring the absolute fact that all of you, no matter what you are, will eventually dissapear from this world when you die, decomposed into the same atoms? And at the same time, why would anyone allow themselves to be stepped on, and have eveyrthing taken away so the "winners" can just fragment further and fight anew? It's a paradox, i tell you.