Please, tell me some of these interviews are staged

>what is a woman

A social construct that includes many factors of femininity and is ever changing

NOOOOOOOOO YOU CANT TELL ME IT IS A FLUID SOCIALLY CONSTRUCTED CONCEPT, I NEED YOU TO GIVE ME A HARDLINE DEFINITION SO I CAN ACCUSE YOU EXCLUDING SOME PEOPLE AND SAY I CAUGHT YOU FUCK FUCK FUCK

>where no one who doesn't already agree with the movie's message would pay to enter, so the people who need to see it the most never will.
are you retarded?
do you think the goal of "the daily wire" is actually to "win the culture war" or something?
this is exactly what they're purpose is, you described it exactly. to peddle BoomerVision to boomers

>includes factors of femininity

thats incredibly exclusionary of you. Are you saying you have to be feminine to be a woman?

This documentary actually convinced me that gender theory is more right than wrong. The main premise this guy went around asking was for a definition of a woman. He can easily get that from a dictionary.

But when humans say they are a woman, for example, they are referring to their gender identity and not their sex assigned as birth. Yet, for some reason he keeps harping on that woman = female. It's apples and oranges.

Even the chicken example was ridiculous too. Our understanding of gender for humans has superseded biological definitions for sex, yet he purposely conflates it as well. We don't call female chickens "women" - they're not fucking humans.

Overall it was a pretty disingenuous piece of commentary but can totally get the appeal if you're still someone living in the past.

The problem with that narrative is the documentary doesn’t really do anything to refute the transgenderism delusion. It just does the whole “I want you to tell me God’s truth” to people who don’t even believe any god is real.

Faggot

is mayonnaise a woman

You’re fucking retarded

You're responding to pasta.

I think tranny stuff has gone way too far but its a giant step back when you have reactionary idiots like Walsh doing bad faith arguments and stirring the pot on twitter

*laughs in African*

wolfe

It is bonkers that these people refuse to define a women but at the same time say that trans women are women. Like if trans women are women that's the equivalent of saying women are women. So why even have trans?

what is a woman?

i fucking hate living in this stage of humanity bros

Boys have a penis, girls have a vagina.

This movie and that faggot’s eceleb status is just so they can lump in anyone against trannies with the Ben Shapiro crowd

i am always incredibly distrustful when it comes to documentaries. you can make intelligent people look like blithering retards with the right editing. however, the gender studies professor saying a woman is someone who identifies as a woman is indefensible. the worst part isn't that he's just retarded. it's that the college hired a literal retard. it's that people pay to learn from this literal retard. it's that people who paid to learn from that literal retard consider themselves enlightened for having paid to learn from that literal retard.

that's a major point of contention within lefty circles, e.g. should transwomen report to CIS lesbians that they have a cock and balls

we am behold the white man ask many unfathomable riddle. he is ask, what if woman, she had the penis? what if man give the birthing labor and bleed from vagene? we am comfound. never heard before such thing in ten thousand generation. this is why we are of the laughter

Attached: laughing-bushmen.jpg (1280x902, 171.87K)

The tranny position is inherently bad faith since its fundamental thesis is an overt denial of reality and Truth. Arguing rationally against someone who does not care about truth is impossible.

Reminder that there's a shot of a topless 15 year old trans boy in this movie, so Walsh either acknowledges the chosen gender of the trans kid or he put kiddie porn in his movie

But what IS it?