>non whites are the violent ones
Non whites are the violent ones
Every recorded battle on Wikipedia, that is
Massacring defenseless rival tribes technically isn't a battle.
I don't think this is even remotely accurate. India, Central Asia, and China are way more empty than they should be.
that explains it, sorta. Even wikipedia has more battles than whats on this map
Yes? Look at all those battles in Italy!
>recorded
This is a bullshit map made by someone who looked at "battle of x" data in Englis Wikipedia and ran with it.
If other sources were seriously read & included, China, Central Asia, and the Middle East would be painted white.
Brown people are just illiterate and can't write
>Brapeacezil
wypipo...
how did india so peaceful? I expected them to be as spotty as europe
It's a fake map.
>BECAUSE THEY ARENT RECORDED ONLY WHITES HAVE WRITTEN LANGUAGE
...
>map of countries with widespread culture of literacy
>Brown people are just illiterate and can't write
Brown people were writing when whites were living in mudhuts
There are thousands of battles that are recorded on Papyrus, birch bark, paper, or stone that aren't on the map
something something living close together something something being violent is based cause it blooms the competitive gene something something sneed have eaten seed of chuck
Us nords are peaceful people
>inb4 flag
I’m 89% Swedish
Impressive how you managed to combine Brazil, brap, ape, and peace.
>WE
That isn't even the argument being made. The argument being made is that the idiot who made it didn't even look for other sources.
>nooooo, browns are too dumb to record history
meanwhile whites....
not so much that, most of the world is sparsely populated, take as instance the middle east, all of the aarabian peninsula is, expectedly, empty, but the levant pure white
That was before *slam so it doesn't count
Truly the gods of this planet.
There's a shit ton of battles here that aren't in the map. I can remember the battle of Itararé, for example.
Why are you so loco over whites ese?
Exhibit A
Shit like this is extremely common across South Asia and South East Asia, not just India.
In comparison, we have no actual idea what nordic history was like because we totally depend on outside sources and "reconstructions" form the 1800s.
The more I study history, the more I realize that so much European history is total guesswork and conjecture, whereas Asian history is held to a very rigorous standard.
Even China who is known for making big claims of the oldest civilization is expected to show radio carbon dated bronze artifacts from 5000 BCE in order to be taken seriously, meanwhile albino monkeys just WE WUZ as egpytians or something because we have nothing but caveman art until 1100 AD from that region of Europe
pratar du svenska då
damn you're so fucking dumb
India was white at the time though.
And 11% negro
northern europe were mud huts until like late gothic era.
>traditionalist
>@seeking_Trad