In 1989 Brasil and China had the same GDP

In 1989 Brasil and China had the same GDP.
Both countries had an average growth of 7%-14% each year since the 60s.
BUT
Brasil accepted the american neoliberalism-human rights bullshit.
China rolled its tanks over those CIA's puppets in that square.
The results 30 years later...

Attached: 1659921898594132.jpg (330x455, 110.67K)

At least Brapzil has hotter women I guess

Russia did the same as Brazil and now it's an economic powerhouse. Markets are the only way forward.

China unlike shitzil developed manufacturing and were given R&D en masse by the capitalists of the entire world. Brazil offers zero logistical and infrastructural advantages to offshoring industry along with retarded tariffs. That's why you're poor and will never make it, even if the US disappeared tomorrow.

yeah based China because American shipped their companies overseas and propped up China! literal fucking retard, AMERICA propped China up, if we had chose another country theyd be the superpower and not China

They were given an entire industrial park for free, plus they had a market freer than the US with no minimum wage, worker rights, or any regulation whatsoever except perhaps for not mentioning Taiwan or some bullshit. Meanwhile we spent this whole time with most of our economy completely closed to the outside world.

>neoliberalism
Nigga you still are protectionist, don't have a BBLR tax system or a comprehensive flat VAT and you even maintain export taxes and government run industries

Economic Freedom basically correlates with GDP per Capita

Attached: images (13).jpg (555x552, 54.3K)

Brazil is the land of wasted potential, forever a shithole

This, but when whe opened our economy we when towards deindustrialization. Brazil used to manufacture computers, trains, tractors, cars, military equipment. Now it's all gone.

we need more economic freedom to brazilians, to create and expand businesses, to compete and grow, not lift protection against foreign capital when we have no developed economy or inovation sector to pop. Our system benefits large corporations and expoils the small and medium businessmen

You didn't have a comparative advantage in any of those. Instead you heavily regulate your primary sector where you do have a comparative advantage

Just goes to show state controlled market socialism is much better than liberalism where only gangster increase their personal gdp instead of the nations.

who is this whore?

Those monopolies also harm small and medium businesses because they push up their costs above the normal level under a competitive system

>Just goes to show state controlled market socialism is much better than liberalism where only gangster increase their personal gdp instead of the nations.
Literally name any socialist economies with per capita above the OECD average

It's a bit iffy to say that's true.
A lot of 3rdie nations have protection so their local industries don't get stomped on by foreign conglomerates.
1stie countries have already developed their local industries and found their niche so they don't need to put up protection. Rather it benefits them to get rid of the protection since trade restrictions are a 2 way street.

>China unlike shitzil developed manufacturing


Brasil was the 7 biggest industrial country in the 70s, retarded

In b4
>YOU HAVE TO INDUSTRIALIZE TO BE RICH

Attached: 1200px-New_Zealand_Exports_Treemap_2017.svg.png (1200x1200, 190.6K)

STFU. Your economy is literally third world tier

China was chosen because they were the country with the largest population willing to do slave labor. You could pick a lot of other countries but their leaders don’t have the all or nothing mentality and would never make it

30% of brazilian gdp was from industry in the 70s

Our mistake: we didnt kill your glowies doing their shit around here

>A lot of 3rdie nations have protection so their local industries don't get stomped on by foreign conglomerates.
All they are doing is forcing people to buy from domestic monopolies which pushes everyone's costs up and even hurts their own exporters. It's like forcing NZ farmers to buy NZ made tractors and fertilizer it would only have the affect of pushing up input costs for farmers and actually harming exports

You have no industries either

Jaw too wide

We have a minimum wage of $14 USD an hour, full employment, and it's such an advanced economy you couldn't even comprehend

China also has 10x the manpower of Brazil and had all of the manufacturing in the world offshored to it

Manufacturing was 30% of our gdp in the 70s, retarded

We should have killed all americans and your NGOs sabotaging our economy in the 80s like the chinese did

>We should have killed all americans and your NGOs sabotaging our economy in the 80s like the chinese did


We still can do it
And then ask russians to install some nukes pointes to NY in the Amazon

You have to give it a chance to grow.
Protection does get overused though.

You will buy our rocks and you will like it.

So advanced The only upper hand you got is being a big and geographically isolated country with a smol population. What works for you, doesn't work for 90% of the world
Same goes for you

ameribraindead once again BTFO impressive how these retards rule the world

The monopolies have to be break by brazilians, the solution is more economic freedoms to the common brazilian
less taxes to brazilians, less regulations to brazilians, less bureaucracy to brazilians. Having strong brazilian companies that have a presence overseas and a large a mount of entepreneuring brazilians at home, limit foreign presence in our strategic sector and allow brazilians to explore any sector at will

Congrats you had comparable industry to romania or eastern france, you were still were still ngmi.

>Our system benefits large corporations and expoils the small and medium businessmen
it is the constitution that allow all these things

no idea what this post tried to convey

5'1 literal goblins like yourself can't even manage a small banana republic

It's not human rights that is the issue. It is China's one party state. Democracy in Brazil is the issue.

China was poor as shit until the 80s and they started opening their markets to foreign investors.

presidencialism and republicanism it is the issue

Things are more complicated than todays numbers. Present socialists countries are countries who have always been behind especially since atlantic touching europe in 1400s advanced ahead of everyone. If germany became a soviet in 1919, they would be above average, while a ethiopian 1919 soviet never had a chance.