In america, yes. It should be no surprise that the country most bombarded by look centric marketing cares immensely about marketing but millennials and zoomed (who are just no starting to go bald) are more neurotic than perhaps any other people in human history.
everyone does, balding is disgusting makes you look older, uglier, and is synonymous with death. It ruins your looks and will effect your jobs and quality of marriage opportunities.
If youre a young man who is balding get on fin and save your hair, balding makes you look disgusting
no it doesent, the studies were done on 55+ boomers who attributed it to fin but were just fat and old. Fin is one of the most prescribed drugs in the world, also when youre bald you wont be using your dick anyway
Samuel Clark
You don't use your penis, anyway.
Hunter Lewis
My problem with fin is rather you're basically paying a subscription for your hair to the same companies that make the chemicals that expedited your loss of it. Really gotta be down bad to pay the people give you back something that they took away
>ally gotta be down bad to pay the people give you back something that they took away
fin is 60-120$ for 14 months, its nothing. you can even stretch it out for 24 months if you take it 3 times a week
Carson Walker
>the chemicals that expedited your loss of it. What?
Jaxson Stewart
Its not a matter of price you nigger its a matter of principle. The same companies that make the chemicals that put plastics/xenoestrogens in the water and mercury in the air are also making you pay for other chemicals to keep something that, would it not be for them, you wouldn't have lost in the first place
>The same companies that make the chemicals that put plastics/xenoestrogens in the water and mercury in the air are also making you pay for other chemicals to keep something that, would it not be for them, you wouldn't have lost in the first place
no they dont Merck & Co. designers cancer drugs, and diabetic medicine. Not global polluters, and besides most hair loss is caused by DHT sensitivity not environmental facts, even if they accelerate hairloss it will be minimal if you dont have the DHT sensitivity gene
DHT is the biggest factor by a long shot in hairloss, not environmental factors. The companies that create fin do not do mass dumpings and environmental contaminations, those belong to oil companies, and fast fashion
Connor Stewart
this guy is defending pharmaceutical corporations
Asher Butler
no im not, I explaining that the ones that create finasteride dont cause environmental problems like someone previous said
>the merck group, one of the largest pharmaceutical conglomerates in the world with products ranging from biopharmaceuticals and bioprocessing agents to liquid crystals, has never once contaminated the environment with chemicals that might be conducive to expediting hairloss >not a SINGLE one of their 43 subsidiaries has ever engaged in unethical dumping >merck animal health has never tested on animals Hello merck employee
Jeremiah Martinez
>crystals, has never once contaminated the environment with chemicals that might be conducive to expediting hairloss >>not a SINGLE one of their 43 subsidiaries has ever engaged in unethical dumping
yes, it really hasnt.
>Hello merck employee
I wish i got paid, i do it for free.
both look like shit, right looks good inspite of being bald, not because of it