Art films are garbage and for faggots who can't read books

Art films are garbage and for faggots who can't read books
Films by guys like Michael Bay or Snyder are unironically better, this isn't bait. Based on auteur theory, they bring an artistic quality to their movies that are honest and not trying to be anything more but action and spectacle. They know how to tell fun stories about man's struggle while art films fuck around with muh big think philosophy. It's fucking boring. Film is a visual medium, one that requires attention to detail not found in art film. You get static shots. Wow. How deep.
Fucking fags.

Attached: maxresdefault-2.jpg (1280x720, 186.68K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinéma_du_look
anyforums.com/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

that's what american remakes are for, breathless makes for way better 80s core and should be up there with Weekend at Bernies.

>they bring an artistic quality to their movies that are honest and not trying to be anything more but action and spectacle.
You should have probably watched at least one Snyder film before making this thread. There are also art films that are about visuals and not philosophy.

This is what happens when you 'try to get into arthouse movies' for ego points or to box check a top ten list and not because you were genuinely interested in the films.

>You should have probably watched at least one Snyder film before making this thread. There are also art films that are about visuals and not philosophy.
ZSJL is basically a silent movie that happens to have dialogue. Seems like a really weird name to drop since Snyder is kind of an artfag.

>Film is a visual medium, one that requires attention to detail not found in art film.
Aka it didn't look expensive enough.
Have you considered trying a wave of cinema with more focus on visual style?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinéma_du_look

Being an incompetent faggot doesn't make you an art fag

Attached: 1653532228430.jpg (404x539, 56.81K)

No but it doesn't mean you aren't one either. Snyder loves symbolism and making references to classic stories, he just thinks buff dudes are a good vehicle for that.

I dont remember Tarkovsky putting muscle heads in Stalker

Gay

I don't think you understand how basic logic works if you think that's an argument.

Go back to your containment thread.
>>>/film/

Reminder that early stage plays were always about fun and entertaining shit not artsy shit.
If Any Forums truly wanted some "trad" conservative world then they would realise that blockbuster films are conservative and that the artsy fartsy movies and celebrity worship are progressive agendas.

Good thread, and based too actually.

t. has never watched a godard film

>rashomon
>art film
So all foreign films are art films?

David Chase was influenced by Federico Fellini and this becomes obvious if you watch 8½ or La Dolce Vita. Similar laidback pacing, similar casual surrealism.

Attached: EBSPG1J9ip2HjvJtUmzlDGLM9EtTFX_large.jpg (1288x1600, 275.56K)

Dont know dont care

It's not about books, visuals, or action, the notion of what's art is fucked up. Art speaks to the soul, overly intellectual garbitch does not.

What does that have to do with anything? David chase is a fucking hack

It's the Amerimutt mindset.

Sneed

>bay and snyder have better films than Bergman
I agree. But why are u shitting on Godard when he's a similar auteur than Bay?

people who say "its a very good film but its too commercial" are annoying in /film/ threads