Which one of these cities is worst

I don't think even Kherson is this bad

Attached: gornja-maoca.jpg (750x500, 225.59K)

Paceville sounds like the name of some african colonial shithole, seems fitting

Ik lief en Urk
Ik ook

lmao

Attached: kek.jpg (2716x828, 609.41K)

leave them alone

That's one house

>tfw I live in my country's city of shame

Attached: 4553 - closed_eyes closed_mouth glasses its_over soyjak stubble text variant_gapejak_front.png (632x900, 92.58K)

>Dzerzhinsk
why? while there is a cities like vorkuta,norilsk?

Gornja maoca being on the list makes no sense, it is literally an abandoned village lol

it's the entire shithole

Attached: _80829900_025712289-1.jpg (624x391, 40.97K)

Attached: 1580074394-mg-5092-website.jpg (1290x860, 383.32K)

Explain what’s wrong with these cities.

MilAno

Well yeah it's a village of 100, is that considered a city in sweden?

Are they the capital?

naples is comfy. Its rundown but theres SOUL everywhere
Madrid is just your average big metropolitan city. Nothing inherently wrong with it but I didnt see anything particularly interesting either

konya is conservative muzzie city. they boo'd 1 minute silence for french terror victims during football game.

>conservative muzzie city
thats your whole country

>Lisbon
>Madrid
>Athens

Attached: shrak.gif (376x362, 73.5K)

Naples is probably the most dangerous city in Italy after Rome and Milan, but differently from these other two it has neither the economical power nor the cultural importance to make it worth something (it does have a lot of cool tourist attractions, but they're nothing compared to Rome's). It's also filled with slums and with (literal) trash, though the latter is partly not even Naples' fault. The stereotypical Neapolitan acts basically almost like a nigger.
2bh its reputation is kind of exaggerated but there's a reason it exists.