ITT: Signs you're about to watch kino

>what is a woman?
A woman is an adult human with a feminine gender identity.

There. We can all move on with our lives now.

No thanks, I lean to the left.

>signs you're about to be hoodwinked by a diminutive heeb

You're a good goy!

oh ok, whats an adult? whats gender? why are women sports separated if it is not based on biology?

So this is a woman because they identify as female?
and this next to Shaprio is?

Attached: ewww.png (1077x604, 1009.66K)

2011 was a different time.

Attached: file.png (1280x720, 104.11K)

>ben’s narrating
>a dinesh dsouza tier libs-are-the-real-racists take
Yeah big kino can’t wait for the next

I answered one question that a 2 year old would ask, I don't think I need to answer 3 more.
>this is a woman because they identify as female?
She is a woman because she has a feminine gender identity. That's different from "identifying as a female", female is a sex, which is separate from gender.

Dailywire has the hottest babes and the best comedy folks

Attached: 16D051BC-591F-49EB-917B-C87488B0955C.jpg (1200x600, 68.34K)

this make tranny suicide statistics rise. based

Are you a biologist?
If not, opinion discarded

A person with two x chromosomes. I let hermaphrodites pick whatever they want though.

Attached: file.png (1280x720, 287.55K)

Good thing gender is neuroscience and not biology then. MSc working in the field btw.

gender is a made up bullshit term created in the 1950s by pedophile John Money. How many times do we have to go over this?

>female is a sex, which is separate from gender.
OK but that is not the current narrative, please download your NPC firmware update.
Not according to supreme court justice's

On the one had we have you saying he made it up.
On the other hand we have the entire body of science, academia and repeated studies which support his work.
I think it's a pretty easy choice.
>that is not the current narrative
The only "narrative" is literally science. If you want to argue with science, reach out to the researchers directly.
>supreme court justice's
I thought you didn't take the opinions of non-accredited scientists seriously? Or are you flipflopping to what is convenient at the moment because you have no intellectual integrity?

Social roles existed well before John Money you enormous dipshit

>Or are you flipflopping to what is convenient at the moment because you have no intellectual integrity?
Kind of sounds like you with your "gender identity" bs
which is not science, and any non-affirmative non-sjw research into anything to do with it is cancelled and buried by insane people.

Holy shit

>Kind of sounds like you
No, I've maintained my argument consistently. Whereas you're constantly trying to weasel out of it. If you can't back up your claims, don't bother responding.
>which is not science
If you say so. The rest of us will sleep easy at night knowing otherwise.
>cancelled and buried by insane people
The conspiracy theory cherry on top. Nice.

Incorrect. Saying your gender identity is feminine doesn’t make you a woman.

When is the documentary coming out?

>Do you feel in charge?

Ok go and start a research project for anything to treat or prevent transgenderism and let me know the progress. :)

Sex is all that matters. What good is gender if you can change it like clothing? Woman = adult human female.

You can be arrested in the UK for calling a trans mtf a male

A person who identifies as a woman.
Next

>go and start research based on an assumption
>an assumption contradicted by the existing body of knowledge
Something tells me that wouldn't get any funding since it would be seen as a waste of resources.
Yes, you're right - woman is just one of many feminine gender identities.
So if none of it matters, why do you have a problem with transwomen?
The erroneous implementation of law in some jurisdictions doesn't contradict science.

wrong

Not wrong.
What's a man?