Is this accurate?

The US seems underrated and Russia/China seem way too overrated

Population:

US: 340 million
Russia: 150 million
China: 1,450 million
India: 1,450 million
Japan: 125 million
SK: 50 million
France: 75 million
UK: 75 million

Attached: Web capture_4-8-2022_214358_www.statista.com.jpg (2225x2019, 384.07K)

China can pretty much wipe out US military with their massive army

Yeah that's bullshit, especially after the Russian shitshow. The Chinese haven't fought in a war for decades, no one can know how their equipment would perform, it's all numbers. The US are still way ahead.

Russia's been absolutely exposed

West said Russia losing therefore it true right? The US also has never fought a near-peer or peer army since WWII, all the wars they've "fought" have been against massively inferior armies with no kind of real defenses

How do Chinese cope with the FACT that everyone on that list aside from Russia will side with the US and declare war on China?

China can't win and they know it.

2 two more weeks to Kiev. Hold on to hope comrades

Oof, this did not age well
That or it account for "theoretical" firepower, and ignored logistics, and what is actually serviceable.

Ukraine had soviet tier equipment. No air force, no navy, no artillery, hardly a near-peer army...The Americans made Iraq look easy, but it had one of the biggest and better trained army in the area. They just got obliterated.

The Benelux can spend just as much on military as Russia if we want.

That's why they made everyone dependent on them. You can't declare war on China if you have no industry.

we are number 1 and it isnt a brag. we are literally a military industrial complex, well until somewhat recently

Thanks, Muhammad
Ukraine was trained by NATO and has NATO weapons. Why does everyone downplay their army?
>but it had one of the biggest and better trained army in the area
Numbers was all they had, all their equipment was unmaintained, just look at clips from the war. No air force, no air defense systems, they were just sitting ducks for gringo jets

Im pretty sure the USA hasnt even used current tech weapons yet. Drones, space weapons, ray weapons.

It goes both ways. If we stop selling our high quality minerals their economy flounders. Besides, the Australian military has always been an underdog and our soldiers are really fucking good at their job.

Nah $tfu bruh

Strategic bombers
---

China: 231 Xi'an H-6 (License built Russian Tupolev-16)

US: 744 B-52 Stratofortress + 188 Rockwell B-1s

Fifth generation fighter
---

China: 50-100 Chengdu J-20s

US: 450 F-35s and 187 F-22s

Stealth strategic bomber
---

China: 0

US: 21 Northrop Grumman B-2

Aircraft carriers
---

China: 3

US: 11

In any proper confrontation bw the US and China, China would be crushed. Xi is not a retard that he didn't want an open conflict with the US. It's best to play safe for them now.

how delusional can your simping get, pedro-san

I'd make China stronger. It's easier for them because they just need to focus on one location while the U.S. is spread out everywhere, but even acknowledging this handicap, I'd still put them ahead of Russia.

Because all their airforce got obliterated during the Gulf War.
And no one is downplaying the Ukrainian army, but if you replace Russia by the US, they would have taken Kiev in 2 weeks.

As a Chinese person, I trust in God. God will help us, He has already helped our people so many times before.

Attached: B1F7E836-9226-445C-8E64-7B0098743778.jpg (480x718, 41.22K)

I don't think Russia is that strong anymore desu

>they would have taken Kiev in 2 weeks
By bombing everything into stone age like the West did in Iraq, Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria?

As a Chinese person, Xi Jinping is my personal God. Please do not send my family to a gulag

>russia
paper tiger

>china
paper tiger

>rest
worthless

The only worthwhile military is the american military, unironically speaking.
>inb4
>beaten by rice farmers
Guerrilla wars have been difficult to fight since the roman times. It's always been a pain in the ass.

But russia failed at even taking ukraine at conventional warfare, the comparison just isn't there.

And china hasn't done shit ever, and when they attacked vietnam (the formal NVA, not a guerrilla), they withdrew back to china.

For all of America's failure. There is no conventional force that could stand it. Even if it gets us nothing.

Attached: 1658887836844021.jpg (236x228, 11.21K)

Well you guys failed the other ways and now you are bombing everything back to the stone age

>with their massive army
# of men =/= power

>into
they were in the stone age from before. We just broke the stone into smaller pieces.

>you guys failed
West won't get Crimea and Donbass full of resources anyway.

Russians are going to blow up the oil and natural gas? Explain

Libya was the richest country in Africa and Yugoslavia was better than contemporary USA.

Do you know who will pay for the Ukrainian reconstruction?

No, Ukraine won't recapture Donbass. Not even Kherson. You'll pay huge amount of money for energy, you'll est bugs and you'll be happy, goy.

Global firepower is junk. This is a better metric, lets face it no one outside of the US can project beyond their borders anyway. This isn't that perfect a metric either, most of the Russian navy is soviet (overweight for the capability) junk that doesn't leave port that they refuse to decomission because true numbers would hurt their ego

Attached: esvc82lmij981.png (3666x1636, 508.15K)

It looks like by the end of August.

Goys like you. 2 more trillion hundred dollars and Ukraine will win. :3

You said Russia has run out of rockets in March lmao.

No naval ensign for the US and France is cringe af

>Libya was the richest country in Africa
OK, and?
Also, libya wasn't even our fault. Look to the french and anglos for that.

>Yugoslavia was better than contemporary USA.
sure buddy.

Unironically it's not really "America's military". The entire structure is built to work with things like NATO. It's more the West's military. If someone attacked Australia, England, Poland, Finland, Portugal, America's military would act immediately. I should probably say yeah USA 1#, but it's just a part of the military of the west.

Russia's reputation has taken a big hit. They would definitely be below China now.

Ofc, but US could do things without others if they absolutely needed to. No one else in the west can

US: 0.02
China: 0.075
Russia: 0.095
India: 0.11
Japan: 0.18
Korea: 0.23
France: 0.15
UK: 0.165

fixed

True. Our money was frozen

If they took troop quality or social cohesion into consideration, the US would rank vastly lower. It looks like they used the NP calculation, which presumes a lot about patriotic morale, social stability, etc.

Oh they absolutely are. Even Democrats recognize China as the bigger threat, they're just trying to be butt buddies with the Europeans rn, which I'm ok with given it got us Finland