Wi cud perfect da Inglish langguwidge over nite if we refered to da letters bi da saownds dei maek; stoped e and i...

Wi cud perfect da Inglish langguwidge over nite if we refered to da letters bi da saownds dei maek; stoped e and i, o and u overlapping; and got rid of da letters j, k, q, and x.

Attached: 16F34C02-6318-46D3-BC10-DBBC9D129AC9.jpg (1744x1536, 997.17K)

>and got rid of da letters j, k, q, and x
I acshually unironically agree with this. Espeshially q, it is the most useless letter in Inglish, and c needz to stop being used for s and sh sounds.

Baised. Baat,
>acstualli*
>unironicalli*
>espeshialli*

Make all verbs regular verbs.
No saw now its seed
No more read now its readed
No more ate not its eated

Vi kud perfekt d inglis leguadze if vi juzd Srbijan latin to vrajt it.

th and ph =/= f

I like Jj though

Yu shud liec wimen not letters

Acstualli, j can stae. It is different enuf from g

gud

Ohld Inglish acshually used y for ih and ee, and g for y and g, and i as ih or a y substitoot. I thingk eyether could werk. Perhaps middell Inglish may be a better model for spellings and dialekt variashunz.

OE
halig - hallee/hollee - holy
fyr - feer - fire
ic - ihk - I
cycen/cicen - chiken/cheeken - chicken

ME
holy
fyr/fier
ic/ich/ih

Yu could also substitoot -dg for j, OE yuzed -cg for it.

brycg - bridge

d͡ʒʌst juːs IPA juː spɜɹɡz

>Wi cud perfect da Inglish langguwidge over nite if we refered to da letters bi da saownds dei maek
>you say and already failed
jokes aside, graphemes aren't pronounced, so the idea in itself is ?????-tier

I will when IPA adds a symbol for English /u/.

what english u phoneme does IPA not have?

What?

>I will when IPA adds a symbol for English /u/.

>quoting me makes understand your question

Attached: 1549801639134.jpg (1600x1283, 375.54K)

makes me*
fugg

I said just use IPA. You said you will when IPA adds a symbol for English /u/. I'm confused because IPA already has symbols for all English phonemes.

>I'm confused because IPA already has symbols for all English phonemes.
IPA has symbols for any language's phonemes; you can basically pick and choose. It doesn't tell me anything. What might be unclear here is that /u/ doesn't necessarily mean [u]. In English, the quality [u] doesn't exist, yet it's used even in narrow transcriptions, because IPA lacks a dedicated symbol for the very unique quality that is English /u/.
'you' is /juː/, yes, but not [juː]

>for the very unique quality that is English /u/.
it's just a slightly more fronted variant of that sound

>slightly
nigga, it's got different rounding and everything