Why does this movie go so fucking hard
Why does this movie go so fucking hard
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
m.youtube.com
twitter.com
and just what is that supposed to mean?
colloquially i think "this goes hard" means "this is good"
Michelle Dockery is quite something
Does this shit slap frfr?
goes hard isn't a zoomer or even a millenial thing you dumb cunts
No one said it was you smooth brain faggot.
The lead being a bit of a dud and the ending being meh drag it down a bit, but pretty good overall.
No cap, yo. Like the new Bengalfuel, but diff
ooh, we gots areselves a regular Professor Arry Iggins ere
It was really good. One of Hunnam's best roles. I thought they did a good job toeing the line between making characters quirky but not cartoonish like in some of Ritchie's other gangster flicks.
Best thing Ritchie's ever done. Critics hated it because the bad guy is a scheming jew.
Guy Ritchie's King Arthur was his last good movie.
King Arthur is a prequel to The Gentlemen
kino just because it included this
I could see that.
half of it was good, other half felt out of place, the puke shit gag with the chink, the retarded backflipping niggers etc
6/10 film attached to a 10/10 soundtrack.
lol the shitty fire particles
thats a nice looking PS3 cutscene
A film so kino it made me wanna go out and buy a tracksuit
Lmao, are you sure this isn't Bollywood?
It genuinely surprised me that she's not Jewish in real life. She really nailed her role. Underrated actress who should have been much bigger much sooner.
Moreover, it was Hugh Grant's best performance since God knows when. The last somewhat comparable to it must have been Cloud Atlas 10 years ago.
I credit Hugh Grant for the brilliance of this movie.
His odious characters are always his best work and the fact that the framing device(him telling the story) was used to push the plot forwards outside of just telling the story itself was really well done.
What was David Beckham's problem?