Chicken Dance Edition
Old thread:
Prehistoric Planet is Full of Shit Part II
Daniel Foster
Other urls found in this thread:
royalsocietypublishing.org
researchgate.net
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Ethan Sullivan
How long till incel meltdown itt
Evan Martinez
You mean appletranny seething? I give it 30 seconds.
Andrew Edwards
If dinosaurs are made up, then they're all scaly and it would be physically impossible, let alone improbable, for them to have feathers.
Because I said so.
John Taylor
Luke Jackson
I feel bad for this guy, all he wants is accurate and honest paleontology and the entire world seems to be against people like him.
>can’t go to Any Forums to discuss how jews are ruining paleontology without fundamentalist christians derailing the thread
>Any Forums is filled with retards and shitposters so most of this discussion goes over their heads
>/his/ doesn’t do animals
>/an/ is decent but it’s where all the feather fags ironic or not congregate and you have to deal with all the zoophiles and scalies
>every other forum kneels to paid off scientists
>lmao deviantart
Ryan Cooper
You stupid faggot. Do you honestly think you're the first shill to use the old "NOOO THIS IS FOR CHILDREN SO YOU'RE STUPID FOR DISLIKING IT!!" line? That's one of the typical Any Forums paid advertiser's favorite talking points.
Sure. In my scheme Silesaurids descend from Aphanosaurs. Since I'm not a cladisticstranny, that doesn't mean Silesaurids are included in Aphanosauria though. I'm a Linnaean. Clearly the chart is still a work in progress and I haven't dove into the entire Pterosaur lineage, since this is just for Dinosaurs, but I DO NOT include Pterosaurs as Archosaurs. I don't think Prorotodactylidae is an hallucination, as a lot of retarded modern "paleontologists" seem to believe.
Jesus christ.
Ethan Sanchez
Actually, myself and a few others have pretty much murdered every feathertranny on /an/. They keep coming back, but they're far less repugnant than they used to be. Scaly T. rex really fucked up their brains. That was their big battle and they lost it. They're still licking their wounds over that one.
Jeremiah Sanders
Btw, this chart isn't super accurate. I've kind of rushed it. I don't consider Paleognaths and Neognaths to be on the same lineage. I don't think Paleognaths descend from flying ancestors currently. I also separate Tinamous' faggoty asses from Ratites proper.
Samuel Taylor
>I'm a Linnaean
Then you should stop and learn something about molecular biology. It's what everyone uses today to study animals, this is not 19th century anymore.
Again, explain why pterosaurs had feathers which were very similar to feathers in dinosaurs.
Gavin Smith
The Linnaean system is superior to your pathetic cladistics nonsense. Nor does it preclude genetic evidence. In fact most retards were surprised to find the Linnaean system had high accuracy when they first started using genetic testing to figure out phylogenies.
And if you were such a brilliant molecular biologist, you would know that genetic evidence isn't as cut and dry as you seem to think, especially if you're only using mitochondrial DNA which a lot of faggots like to use because they can get intentionally false results out of it. Where you draw the line between one species and another is still a judgement call and how far something is genetically from another species in your testing is entirely related to your sample set.
Owen James
based
Ethan Howard
Are these retards really talking about the genomes of fucking fossil organisms from the Mesozoic? Jesus christ the absolute hubris.
Hunter Torres
>still sperging about a point I didn't even make
Lmfao. My point was that you don't have any grounds to use cuck as an insult when you're basically the dictionary definition of one. That should have been clear if you actually READ my post instead of pattern matching, but I guess given the level of reading comprehension you've displayed, it might not have made a difference.
Chase Taylor
There are schizos in every field. There's this whole movement claiming that birds are not theropod dinosaurs but came from some triassic tree reptiles.
Tyler Clark
You anons arguing are trying to talk all intellectual but you are acting like toddlers (also the average age of dinosaur fans lol)
Jace Murphy
>superior
DNA disagrees.
Ryan Brown
Bro that's old as fuck. Pretty much nobody believes that anymore. If the featherfaggots just said "birds came from dinosaurs" and left it at that, there wouldn't be this fucking chaos in Mesozoic paleontology, but they couldn't. Because contrarians can never stop themselves and now we have all sorts of fucked up spaghetti "theories" that have the Dinosaur tree all fucked the hell up with a million retards trying to cram hoaxed chinese fossils in and constantly failing to do so without coming up with retarded fucking ideas like "actually the ancestral amphibian had feathers".
DNA does not disagree with the Linnaean system, you moron.
Adrian Russell
How do I get redpilled on paleontology so I can start making featherfags kill themselves?
Ian James
It's not about genomes, but cells.
Joseph Hill
No one also believes in your theories, you know that?
>DNA does not disagree with the Linnaean system, you moron.
It often does.
Juan Smith
The Bell paper from 2014 is a good start. Here are some starter images. Featherfagggots are the worlds bitchiest contrarians, so of course they tried to bite off the biggest target they could chew (T. rex) and it instead pecked out their livers.
royalsocietypublishing.org
A lot of stupid featherfaggots, as you may be aware, are now trying to claim that everything that came before dinosaurs also had feathers (it didn't). A basic understanding of Silesaurids and Aphanosaurs will put that shit to rest. They literally had osteoderms on their backs. Not the kind of thing you would typically find on a feathered animal.
Lewisuchus, an early Ornithischian:
William Kelly
Feathered dinosaurs is the redpill you fucking moron. You realize they're not like the toys you used to play with or like in Jurassic Park. That's the redpill. Reality will move on without you and feathers will become mainstream. There's nothing you can do to stop this. Either you accept it or you just keep bitching about it on Any Forums.
Jeremiah Thompson
rex sex
Hunter Cooper
>Chinese hoaxed fossils
Is this also a hoax?
Adam Perry
>often
What a weasel word. How often? The Linnaean system does what it was meant to do. It gives order. Cladistics brings fucking chaos and homosexuality, furfaggotry.
That's a ratite. Ratites have feathers.
Brayden Harris
Some of the visuals look good but some just look unfinished holy shit.
Jack Cox
That's a Theropod from Bavaria, dipshit. It's fine. I love how you feathertrannies simply cannot accept that as long as you keep your featherfaggotry to the animals that actually had them nobody fucking cares.
Ryder Jackson
I'm going to believe the other user that provided me information and didn't go out of his way to insult me. Sorry!
Josiah Howard
Pussy
Nolan Gonzalez
I am what I eat.
Owen Cruz
It doesn't matter what you choose to believe. The reality is that feathers are here to stay and that you and the other user will be left in the dust. It's over.
Connor Kelly
I said 2014. I meant the 2017 paper by Bell.
Carson Taylor
>These new findings demonstrate that extensive feather coverings observed in some early tyrannosauroids were lost by the Albian, basal to Tyrannosauridae. This loss is unrelated to palaeoclimate but possibly tied to the evolution of gigantism, although other mechanisms exist.
?
It doesn't contradict anything "featherfags" claim. Tyrannosaurs was also depicted as having scales in the documentary.
Blake Robinson
>Thanos (named for the Marvel Comics character) is a genus of carnivorous brachyrostran abelisaurid dinosaur that lived in Brazil
Kinda crazy how old some countries are
Jaxon Cooper
It's a false order, it's not based on reality.
Brandon Cox
Don't tell him that he'll have another meltdown like in the last thread.