Flat Elizabeth vs BOOBA Elizabeth

>flat Elizabeth vs BOOBA Elizabeth
Who was better?

Attached: 234565921.jpg (2400x1543, 554.63K)

Other urls found in this thread:

thisvid.com/videos/laurence-fox-full-frontal-in-the-hole/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Bigger is always better

I've never cared for Keira Knightley's face; it has a skelly quality to it.

yes which is why your tiny cock could never please a woman

It annoys me intensely that they even bothered making the Knightley adaptation after peak adaptation perfection was already achieved. It means fewer people will check out the BBC version first.

they're both ugly so the one with bigger tits

Rude and uncalled for

False, there is a such thing as too big...

>caring about a woman's pleasure

Its weird how Keira went topless in a movie when she was only 15

No, there isnt.

>peak adaptation perfection was already achieved
the bbc series is so good, perfectly captures austen's humor which the movie just glosses over. only sutherland acted like an austen character, rest were mediocre at best.

It's not weird, it was an essential part of the script, but she didn't have a lot to show us.

not really

Yeah right, there's no way that's true. That would be illegal.

Attached: 1653363764419.jpg (540x517, 23K)

Its also weird how she had scene in the same movie where she walked into male locker room and was exposed to several full frontal nude guys

>Both ugly

Attached: 283738191447545.jpg (2400x831, 352.82K)

I don't believe you

Same with Jane Eyre. 2006 miniseries was legit. 2011 movie was pointless.

thisvid.com/videos/laurence-fox-full-frontal-in-the-hole/

When did you know you were gay?

yes

This. I've watched all Jane Eyre adaptations and 2006 was a clear winner. Too bad it was in shitty quality, have they ever released it on blu-ray or something?

I don't believe you