He's literally me

He's literally me

Attached: images-1148.jpg (574x414, 27.25K)

>MINI
>MENTAL
>STATUS
> TEST JERRY, JUST THINK ABOUT IT

In the sense that he's retarded or?

What the fuck is actualy wrong with that man? Please don't say autism, on the contrary he's perfectly confident with himself and a literal doctor of the human mind. Why can't he just answer yes or no? He goes off into these tangents, all the while raising the points that are valid so he can answer his own question.

What was that mouth gesture he made when the lawyer asked him, "Willie Wonka doesn't matter to you?" Early on, the judge sternly tells him to simply answer the question. The judge asks the easiesy hed's got, only for doc to freeze staring at the ceiling before resuming his incoherent rambling. They seriously gave this lunatic a doctrates while we work full-time to barely cover school and rent.

Attached: newFile-12.jpg (982x726, 51.73K)

a dumbass?

peanuthead

Now they bringing in Tim Burton characters?

Does anyone remember hearing the whispering coming back from break? He might have said
>is there something i'm not allowed to lie about

Attached: 8753A187-E0F6-49EF-91B1-D4FFCD787DFC.jpg (918x1295, 111.83K)

smart for his field, but retarded in every other aspect

many such cases for drs. academics, etc.

he's the type of guy whose whole identity is tied up around being a smug know it all prick. When challenged on his superiority, that really set him off.

He looks like he pays a dominatrix to kick him in the testicles

>DOES WILLY WONKA MEAN NOTHING TO YOU!?

>GREAT SCOTT

he was actually right

About what?

About marlon Brando being dead

About contrarian homosexuals in Any Forums

It's a Jew. Have you seen his profile?
>What was that mouth gesture
Inbreeding and psychotropic medication.

His job is to professionally stone wall the opposition so any question they ask get non-answered in the hopes that they get so little that they simply have wasted their time. The issue is he's so transparent that he looks like an asshole and nothing more. It's been the same with all the "experts" amber has produced, they're professional stallers. They are certain and know everything with absolute accuracy when their side asks them anything, and they're cagey and ramble about nothing when the other side asks them anything. It'd be a fine tactic if it wasn't overused. Realistically, all it shows is extreme and unbelievable bias to the point that no reasonable jury is going to put much weight in a thing they say. Plus they've been routinely btfo so hard this really should be a murder trial at this point.

you know exactly why

Attached: 1647588487954.jpg (200x200, 8.43K)

Attached: ec1.png (568x319, 282.14K)

except in that regard he was wrong from a certain point of view