Why was it so boring?

Why was it so boring?

Attached: BA84E3F7-17FD-4DC7-ADA1-66A7C5D3179C.jpg (1700x1700, 580.34K)

Because it is 100% the exact same movie as everything else in the past 10 years

What did you find boring?

I likea when the soundtrack goed loud.

Everything. I was starting to fall asleep. I barely remember any details or understood what was going on. There were good visuals, but it didn’t catch any interesting. Just worms, blue eyes and sand

That’s literally have humanity was created user.

Literally they wrote everybody as fake victorian except pauls epicly relatable friend, duncan donut from the great state of obesity. So that makes it cinema rather than flick.

yhx8xits dishonest.

Attached: dishonest af.jpg (2000x2232, 655.82K)

This was my gripe with it too. Like, put some Dune in your Dune movie my dude.

>I barely remember any details or understood what was going on.
That's because DUNC omitted all the details and the connective tissue from the book.
Watch another adaptatin or play the porn game if you want to understand what it's actually about.

Dennis couldn't make a compelling narrative if his life depended on it

This, the only redeeming thing about this movie is some good visuals, that's all.

>Literally they wrote everybody as fake victorian except pauls epicly relatable friend, duncan donut from the great state of obesity. So that makes it cinema rather than flick.
This. He's fucking terrible and out of place when he's not being angry.

It's boring because they were terrified of taking risks with the worldbuilding so they just made it dull on purpose. All these characters are pissing and shitting and sharting themselves in this pic by the way and they are about to drink their piss, shit, and sharts.

Attached: 1638994440701.jpg (1500x750, 178.38K)

Because anything made by Villememe is cold and empty and the cast sucks ass

The cast is fucking terrible.

Normies were able to follow the plot. Why are you admitting on a chinese basket weaving forum that you're a moron, user?

The source material is boring at times. You're supposed to appreciate the world building and be fascinated by every detail, but if not you're just bored. The main thing holding back the movie is that it's the familiar story of a "chosen one" rising from the ashes to great new heights by proving his strength, but part 1 ends right before he has a chance to really do anything. The good parts all come as he's rising to power bit by bit and then taking revenge. Taken on it's own part 1 makes for a boring movie about a boy trying to act like a man for the first time just so he can survive some elaborate plot with no stakes other than that the outcome determines if the ones who get the exploit the barren desert planet are wearing sharp military uniforms or evil black armor. You've gotta really be enamored with the whole setting to care about any of this, especially without the full hero arc.

Lynch's Dune is superior to Villeneuve's in almost every aspect.

>hear about Dune but never read it
>decide to read it before seeing the movie
>take my time reading the book, it's pretty damn good. enjoying the worldbuilding and autistically saying "10 dread legions of sardukar" to my cat
>movie is pretty much a direct and accurate adaptation of the first half of the book

if you expect it to be STAR WORS you will be dissapointed. but most book to movie adaptations are fucking rushed. the movie might not have been HELLA EPIC but it was very faithful to the books. i think my only complaint was that i imagined lady jessica to be hotter, but maybe that's my headcanon

Villeneuve has shit for vision. He makes everything look empty, grey, and soulless when there's so much room to go wild. Lynch did do better, but neither really nailed it for me. There are supposed to be elements of fantasy to it all, not just hard sci-fi realism.

Nah. I can follow Christopher Nolan plots well. Dune just wasn't interesting enough to grab my attention and as a result the story just seems more and more nonsensical

Because there was so much to show they never had enough screen time to show anything so it become weirdly incoherent and boring. None of the scenes have enough time to develop and make an impression. Once the movie is over you have no meaningful memory of what had happened.

>couldn't make a compelling narrative
But in this case, he wouldn't even have had to make one himself. He just needed to copy it straight from the book. Why couldn't he do that?

>Normies
It's called "normalfag", you normalfag Villeneuve drone.

Because it looks boring. Greig Fraser is a hack.

Star Wars is a better adaptation of Dune than DUNC is.
Hell, Cats (2019) is a better adaptation of Dune than DUNC.

>you just wanted this and that
cope.
you just wanted to like it to distinguish yourself from other capeshitters

They were faithful to the story for sure, but they failed to draw non-readers into the world and most of them probably walked away unimpressed. Just show the navigators, show the emperor and the extent of his empire, show the spice smugglers. They glossed over so many things and so what we got looked like ordinary ass sci-fi, straight from whatever streaming platform.