Killing child molesters is Le Bad because... look it just is OKAY?!

>Killing child molesters is Le Bad because... look it just is OKAY?!

Attached: 731DDE4F-0D12-42CE-BDA6-AFC897BDB5D9.jpg (1327x1600, 198.45K)

Who said that?

Watch the movie smartass -
>end of the movie main guy kills a bunch of child rapists
>this is portrayed as bad because violence bad even when people deserve it and le pretentious hollywood morality

No, dumbass, it's bad because he completely lost it, and in his anger instead of calling the police and testifying he kills.
But most importantly, he was going to kill Palantine, which was a really bad action that would have made him evil, but he thinks it through and does the better thing instead.
While not optimal, he in the end kind of redeems himself by going for the pedos instead of Palantine.
He also probably traumatized the kid for life and should have done it more carefully.

No one said that its bad.....How can you miss the point that hard?

i dont get what im suppose to take away from this film.

at the end, the last shot he looks at betsy through his rearview mirror, and the backwards music at that moment is suppose to represent his inevitable return to his cycle of abuse

so, life sucks and if you have the chance kill politicians but if you fuck up, go for lower level criminals like pimps and drug dealers?

Attached: DPl9MVlU8AAyX-U.jpg (1200x648, 113.39K)

The point is that he hasn't received any of the help he needs.
He has a serious mental problem, but no one cared until he shot up someone, and even then, they care about his action but not really about him or his actual problem.

Imagine missing the point this badly.

actually its about toxic masculinity sweaty

>calling the police and testifying
lol. No, actually... kek.
Dare I say it, lmao.

Unironically what the fuck did he think would happen bringing her to a porn theather?
I'm bad with girls, but god fucking damn it, that's another level of stupid.

VIGILANTES BAD
MAFIOSOS COOL

Attached: 800px-Martin_Scorsese_by_David_Shankbone[1].jpg (800x1089, 179.52K)

If he really wanted to kill them, he should at least have done it not in front of Iris.
But my point is not that he shouldn't have killed them, but rather that that's not the point of the movie.

It's bad because Travis was a pedophile and wanted the girl for himself. He thinks he's better than the pimp but he's even worse, he only cares about her because he wants to rail her. He's a creep.

Attached: we.jpg (700x955, 103.87K)

The point is there was no catharsis. He is lost and angry and he wants destruction. His killings this time made him a vigilante hero, next time it might make him a domestic terrorist.

>child molester
jodie foster's character isn't a child though

She was 12 right?

No, the diner scene made clear he wants to help her, but he's too autistic to properly explain himself or convince her.
He follows her in the first place because he feels guilty about not saving her from the pimp the first time he sees her in his taxi.

VIGILANTE BAD
JEW CRIMINAL BADASS

Attached: new-wolf-of-wall-street-trailer-leonardo-dicaprio-is-the-wealthiest-stockbroker-in-the-world[1].jpg (704x528, 25.36K)

He can't help her because he can't help anyone, he'd just end up raping her.

Isn't the whole point of his movies how deranged and devoid of happiness a life like that becomes? Until it eventually slips out of control and you lose everything?

Maybe YOU should watch It
Or maybe just buy some fucking brains you stupid piece of retarded zoomer SHITSTAIN

I don't know why you have this interpretation of the movie, but I'm positive that's neither what the movie meant nor how most people see it.
Why would he rape her?

This is true but Travis never admits it to himself. I don't think he's worse than the pimp though.

>how deranged and devoid of happiness a life like that becomes?
no, the point is it's cool but only if you can get away with it

Attached: 1_bcpVpCn7w4lYD20e4J0dWw[1].jpg (700x393, 21.54K)